Types of neurons in the enteric nervous system
Open accessAbstract
This paper, written for the symposium in honour of more than 40 years' contribution to autonomic research by Professor Geoffrey Burnstock, highlights the progress made in understanding the organisation of the enteric nervous system over this time. Forty years ago, the prevailing view was that the neurons within the gut wall were post-ganglionic neurons of parasympathetic pathways. This view was replaced as evidence accrued that the neurons are part of the enteric nervous system and are involved in reflex and integrative activities that can occur even in the absence of neuronal influence from extrinsic sources. Work in Burnstock's laboratory led to the discovery of intrinsic inhibitory neurons with then novel pharmacology of transmission, and precipitated investigation of neuron types in the enteric nervous system. All the types of neurons in the enteric nervous system of the small intestine of the guinea-pig have now been identified in terms of their morphologies, projections, primary neurotransmitters and physiological identification. In this region there are 14 functionally defined neuron types, each with a characteristic combination of morphological, neurochemical and biophysical properties. The nerve circuits underlying effects on motility, blood flow and secretion that are mediated through the enteric nervous system are constructed from these neurons. The circuits for simple motility reflexes are now known, and progress has been made in analysing those involved in local…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Altered neurophysiology of sympathetic innervation results in altered GI transit, motility and secretion, primarily via modification of cholinergic transmission and sphincter contractions on smooth muscle.
“Altered neurophysiology of sympathetic innervation results in altered GI transit, motility and secretion, primarily via modification of cholinergic transmission and sphincter contractions on smooth muscle (Furness, 2000;Janig, 2006).”
From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Furness, 2000
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 89 · Cited by 855
- Authors
- Furness, J. B.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Furness, J.B
- ORCID
- Furness, J.B
- Venue
- Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 87-96
- ISSN
- 0165-1838 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990736267
- Cited by
- 855
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 4.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
- Keywords
- enteric nervous system, neuronal cell types, small intestine, neurotransmitters, neuronal morphology, enteric reflexes, gastrointestinal motility, intestinal blood flow
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Interneurons, Motor Neurons, Neurons, Neurons, Afferent, Vasomotor System, Enteric Nervous System
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review