The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ageing behaviour and analytical pyrolysis characterisation of diterpenic resins used as art materials: Manila copal and sandarac
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sandarac resin, derived from Tetraclinis, can also be excluded as this resin should also contain free diterpenoids such as sandaracopimaric acid and acetoxy agatholic acid, even after aging or pyrolysis [75].”
From Holy Smoke in Medieval Funerary Rites: Chemical Fingerprints of Frankincense in Southern Belgian Incense Burners (2014) · cites this paper as [75]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Scalarone, 2002, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 64, 345, 10.1016/S0165-2370(02)00046-3 · DOI
- Smith, 1981, Phytochemistry, 9, 2205, 10.1016/0031-9422(81)80113-6 · DOI
- Gough, 1964, Chem. Ind., 12, 2059
- van den Berg, 2000, J. Mass Spectrom., 35, 512, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(200004)35:4<512::AID-JMS963>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
- van der Doelen, 1998, Stud. Conserv., 43, 249, 10.1179/sic.1998.43.4.249 · DOI
- Challinor, 1989, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 16, 323, 10.1016/0165-2370(89)80015-4 · DOI
- Challinor, 2001, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 61, 3, 10.1016/S0165-2370(01)00146-2 · DOI
- Hashimoto, 1981, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 29, 1475, 10.1248/cpb.29.1475 · DOI
- Anderson, 1992, Org. Geochem., 18, 829, 10.1016/0146-6380(92)90051-X · DOI
- Clifford, 1995, Org. Geochem., 23, 407, 10.1016/0146-6380(95)00022-7 · DOI
- Ishida, 1995, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 33, 167, 10.1016/0165-2370(94)00860-4 · DOI
- D. Scalarone, J. van der Horst, J.J. Boon, O. Chiantore, Direct-temperature mass spectrometric detection of volatile terpenoids and natural terpenoid polymers in fresh and artificially aged resins, J. Mass Spectrom., in press.
- van der Doelen, 1998, Stud. Conserv., 43, 249, 10.1179/sic.1998.43.4.249 · DOI
- Papageorgoiu, 1997, J. Chromatogr. A, 769, 263, 10.1016/S0021-9673(96)01032-1 · DOI
- Pastorova, 1997, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 43, 41, 10.1016/S0165-2370(97)00058-2 · DOI
- Beck, 1986, Appl. Spectrosc. Rev., 22, 57, 10.1080/05704928608060438 · DOI
- Zumbühl, 1998, Anal. Chem., 70, 707, 10.1021/ac970574v · DOI
- Wu, 1997, Phytochemistry, 44, 101, 10.1016/S0031-9422(96)00519-5 · DOI
- Enzell, 1961, Acta Chem. Scand., 15, 1303, 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.15-1303 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baeten, J., Deforce, K., Challe, S., De Vos, D., & Degryse, P. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113142 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Scalarone, D., Lazzari, M., & Chiantore, O.
- Venue
- Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 68-69
- Pages
- 115-136
- ISSN
- 0165-2370
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review