Surface and bulk chemistry of charcoal obtained by vacuum pyrolysis of bark: influence of feedstock moisture content
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Softwoods have higher surface area (326.0 m2/g) than hardwoods (221.0 m2/g) as feedstock.
“Darmstadt et al. (2000) observed higher surface area for the softwoods (326.0 m 2 /g) than the hardwoods (221.0 m 2 /g) feedstock.”
From Biochar physicochemical properties: pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects (2020) · cites this paper as Darmstadt et al. 2000
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 72
- Authors
- Darmstadt, H., Pantea, D., Sümmchen, L., Roland, U., Kaliaguine, S., & Roy, C.
- Affiliations
- Québec Metro High Tech Park (Canada) (CA)
- Université Laval (CA)
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Roy, Christian
- Venue
- Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 0165-2370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040352688
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Keywords
- wood charcoal, vacuum pyrolysis, feedstock moisture content, softwood bark, bulk structure, graphite-like structure, specific surface area
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
