The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analyst forecast accuracy: Do ability, resources, and portfolio complexity matter?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2015) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2268 · Cited by 1,124
International Diversification and Analysts' Forecast Accuracy and Bias
Duru, A., & Reeb, D. M. (2002) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2002.77.2.415 · Cited by 438
Decision fatigue and heuristic analyst forecasts
Hirshleifer, D., Levi, Y., Lourie, B., & Teoh, S. H. (2019) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.01.005 · Cited by 248
Changes in Analysts' Information around Earnings Announcements
Barron, O. E., Byard, D., & Kim, O. (2002) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2002.77.4.821 · Cited by 248
Climate Sensitivity and Predictable Returns
Kumar, A., Xin, W., & Zhang, C. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3331872 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Clement, M. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Accounting and Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 285-303
- ISSN
- 0165-4101 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076480217
- Cited by
- 1,423
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyst forecast accuracy: Do ability, resources, and portfolio complexity matter? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0165-4101(99)00013-0
- The paper
- Clement, M. B. (1999). Analyst forecast accuracy: Do ability, resources, and portfolio complexity matter? Journal of Accounting and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(99)00013-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
