Cited by 35Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma CasesGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments

Losses in chromosomes 17, 19, and 22q in neurofibromatosis type 1 and sporadic neurofibromas

Koga, Takamasa, Iwasaki, Hiroshi, Ishiguro, Masako, Matsuzaki, Akio, Kikuchi, Masahiro·2002·Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (von Recklinghausen's NF1) is an autosomal dominant disease associated with an increased risk of benign and malignant neoplasia including malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs). In this study, we employed comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to determine changes in the relative chromosome copy number in 24 patients with neurofibromas, including 12 NF1-associated and 12 sporadic cases. Differences in the frequency and distribution of chromosomal imbalances were observed in both NF1-asociated and sporadic neurofibromas. Chromosomal imbalances were more common in NF1-associated tumors than in sporadic neurofibromas. In both groups, the number of losses was higher than the number of gains, suggesting a predominant role of tumor suppressor gene in tumorigenesis. A number of new chromosomal imbalances were noted including chromosomes 17, 19, and chromosome arm 22q, which may be related to oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes in neurofibromas. In NF1-associated neurofibromas, the most frequent losses were found in chromosome 17 (the minimal common regions were 17p11.2-->p13 in nine cases and 17q24-->q25 in six cases) and 19p (19p13.2 in nine cases). In addition, both NF1-associated and sporadic neurofibromas often exhibited losses at chromosome arms 19q and 22q (in NF1 tumors, the minimal common regions were 19q13.2-->qter in seven cases).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-4608(02)00527-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koga, T., Iwasaki, H., Ishiguro, M., Matsuzaki, A., & Kikuchi, M.
Affiliations
Fukuoka University (JP)
Corresponding author
Iwasaki, Hiroshi
Venue
Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-07
Volume
136
Issue
2
Pages
113-120
ISSN
0165-4608 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W119234088
Cited by
35
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Keywords
neurofibromatosis type 1, neurofibroma, chromosome 22q loss, chromosomal imbalances, copy number alterations, tumor suppressor, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Chromosome Aberrations, Chromosome Deletion, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neurofibroma, Neurofibromatosis 1, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Skin Neoplasms, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review