Cited by 124Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsImmunotoxicology and immune responses

In vivo and in vitro treatment with the synthetic cannabinoid CP55,940 decreases the in vitro migration of macrophages in the rat: involvement of both CB1 and CB2 receptors

Sacerdote, Paola, Massi, Paola, Panerai, Alberto E, Parolaro, Daniela·2000·Journal of Neuroimmunology

Abstract

Cannabinoids have been shown to affect immune responses, acting on different populations of immune cells. In the present paper we analyze the ability of in vivo and in vitro treatment with the potent synthetic cannabinoid CP55,940 to interfere with an important function of rat peritoneal macrophages, i.e. spontaneous migration and formyl-metionyl-leucine-phenylalanine (fMLP)-induced chemotaxis, that were assessed by the use of a Boyden-modified microchemotaxis chamber. When added in vitro, CP55,940 induced a significant and dose-dependent inhibition of both spontaneous migration and fMLP-induced chemotaxis. Both the Cannabinoid Receptor 1 (CB1) and the Cannabinoid Receptor 2 (CB2) antagonists were able to block the CP55,940-induced inhibition of spontaneous migration, although the CB2 antagonist was more potent and only the CB2 antagonist was able to reverse the effect of CP55,940 on fMLP-induced chemotaxis. Similarly, in the in vivo experiments, 1 h after the acute subcutaneous administration of 0.4 mg/kg of CP55,940, both spontaneous motility and chemotaxis were reduced. The pretreatment with the CB2 antagonist, but not with the CB1 antagonist, was able to prevent this effect. Our data confirm that cannabinoids can affect some macrophage functions, mainly throughout CB2 receptors, and suggest that the development of specific CB2 ligands may lead to an interesting new class of anti-inflammatory drugs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-5728(00)00307-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 124

Authors
Sacerdote, P., Massi, P., Panerai, A. E., & Parolaro, D.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Sacerdote, Paola
Venue
Journal of Neuroimmunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
109
Issue
2
Pages
155-163
ISSN
0165-5728 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075171154
Cited by
124
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroimmunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IrInSubria (University of Insubria) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
CP55,940, synthetic cannabinoids, macrophage migration, chemotaxis, CB1 receptor, CB2 receptor, cannabinoid receptor antagonists, peritoneal macrophages, fMLP, anti-inflammatory agents, immunomodulation
MeSH terms
Rimonabant, Animals, Camphanes, Cannabinoids, Cell Movement, Cells, Cultured, Cyclohexanols, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Piperidines, Pyrazoles, Receptors, Drug, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Macrophages, Peritoneal, Receptors, Cannabinoid, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review