The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
One-tube fluorogenic reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for the quantitation of feline coronaviruses
Open accessAbstract
A one-tube reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for absolute feline coronavirus (FCoV) quantitation was developed. The assay is based on the 5′ nuclease activity of the Thermus flavus (Tfl) polymerase and a fluorogenic probe which generates fluorescence when it is cleaved. The fluorogenic probe, also called TaqMan™ probe (Perkin Elmer, Foster City, USA), is an oligonucleotide designed to bind between the two PCR primers to the target cDNA and is labeled with a reporter and a quencher dye. In the intact probe, the quencher dye suppresses the fluorescence of the reporter dye by Förster-type energy transfer. During the polymerase extension steps the Tfl exonuclease activity cleaves the hybridised probe resulting in the generation of fluorescent emission of the reporter dye. The threshold cycle (CT value) indicates the increase of reporter fluorescence and is directly related to the initial amount of target cDNA or RNA, respectively. Fluorescence is monitored in real time after each cycle by a Perkin-Elmer ABI Prism® 7700 Sequence Detector. After completion of amplification, the CT values of the samples are calculated back to a standard curve, generated by amplification of diluted standard molecules. The one-tube RT-PCR described below allows precise quantitation, is highly sensitive, rapid (no separate reverse transcription step and no post-amplification steps), easy to handle, allows for a high sample throughput, shows a very good reproducibility, and can be executed with a low risk of contamination. The design of the primers–probe combination enables the detection of all known FCoV strains and is also useful for the detection of canine coronavirus, transmissible gastroenteritis virus and porcine respiratory coronavirus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA
Birnboim, H. C., & Doly, J. (1979) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/7.6.1513 · Cited by 14,686
Cited by
Conceição-Neto, N., Zeller, M., Lefrère, H., De Bruyn, P., Beller, L., Deboutte, W., Yinda, C. K., Lavigne, R., Maes, P., Ranst, M. V., et al. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep16532 · Cited by 363
NISHIMURA, M., YAGUTI, H., YOSHITSUGU, H., NAITO, S., & SATOH, T. (2003) · YAKUGAKU ZASSHI · doi:10.1248/yakushi.123.369 · Cited by 313
Detection and monitoring of virus infections by real-time PCR
Watzinger, F., Ebner, K., & Lion, T. (2006) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2005.12.001 · Cited by 281
Pedersen, N. C., Sato, R., Foley, J. E., & Poland, A. M. (2004) · Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jfms.2003.08.008 · Cited by 193
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gut, M., M. Leutenegger, C., B. Huder, J., C. Pedersen, N., & Lutz, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Virological Methods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-46
- ISSN
- 0166-0934 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080149068
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: One-tube fluorogenic reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for the quantitation of feline coronaviruses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0166-0934(98)00129-3
- The paper
- Gut, M., M. Leutenegger, C., B. Huder, J., C. Pedersen, N., & Lutz, H. (1999). One-tube fluorogenic reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for the quantitation of feline coronaviruses. Journal of Virological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-0934(98)00129-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.