The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Surrogate time series
Open accessAbstract
Before we apply nonlinear techniques, e.g. those inspired by chaos theory, to dynamical phenomena occurring in nature, it is necessary to first ask if the use of such advanced techniques is justified by the data. While many processes in nature seem very unlikely a priori to be linear, the possible nonlinear nature might not be evident in specific aspects of their dynamics. The method of surrogate data has become a very popular tool to address such a question. However, while it was meant to provide a statistically rigorous, foolproof framework, some limitations and caveats have shown up in its practical use. In this paper, recent efforts to understand the caveats, avoid the pitfalls, and to overcome some of the limitations, are reviewed and augmented by new material. In particular, we will discuss specific as well as more general approaches to constrained randomisation, providing a full range of examples. New algorithms will be introduced for unevenly sampled and multivariate data and for surrogate spike trains. The main limitation, which lies in the interpretability of the test results, will be illustrated through instructive case studies. We will also discuss some implementational aspects of the realisation of these methods in the TISEAN software package.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
Characteristics of hand tremor time series
Timmer, J., Gantert, C., Deuschl, G., & Honerkamp, J. (1993) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00202568 · Cited by 112
Cited by
Can sliding-window correlations reveal dynamic functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI?
Hindriks, R., Adhikari, M. H., Murayama, Y., Ganzetti, M., Mantini, D., Logothetis, N. K., & Deco, G. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.055 · Cited by 632
Identifying neural drivers with functional MRI: an electrophysiological validation
David, O., Guillemain, I., Saillet, S., Reyt, S., Deransart, C., Segebarth, C., & Depaulis, A. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060315 · Cited by 533
Recent pause in the growth rate of atmospheric CO2 due to enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake
Keenan, T. F., Prentice, I. C., Canadell, J. G., Williams, C. A., Wang, H., Raupach, M., & Collatz, G. J. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13428 · Cited by 474
Phanerozoic Earth System Evolution and Marine Biodiversity
Hannisdal, B., & Peters, S. E. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1210695 · Cited by 231
The contribution of geometry to the human connectome
Roberts, J. A., Perry, A., Lord, A. R., Roberts, G., Mitchell, P. B., Smith, R. E., Calamante, F., & Breakspear, M. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.009 · Cited by 213
Metadata
- Authors
- Schreiber, T., & Schmitz, A.
- Venue
- Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 346-382
- ISSN
- 0167-2789 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024383241
- Cited by
- 1,514
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surrogate time series. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0167-2789(00)00043-9
- The paper
- Schreiber, T., & Schmitz, A. (2000). Surrogate time series. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2789(00)00043-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.