CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 77Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsMembrane Separation and Gas TransportAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies

Evaluation of methanol crossover in proton-conducting polyphosphazene membranes

Fedkin, Mark V, Zhou, Xiangyang, Hofmann, Michael A, Chalkova, Elena, Weston, Jamie A, Allcock, Harry R, Lvov, Serguei N·2002·Materials Letters
DOI 10.1016/s0167-577x(01)00391-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-577x(01)00391-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 77

Authors
Fedkin, M. V., Zhou, X., Hofmann, M. A., Chalkova, E., Weston, J. A., Allcock, H. R., & Lvov, S. N.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lvov, Serguei N
ORCID
Venue
Materials Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
192-196
ISSN
0167-577X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0167-577x(01)00391-3
OpenAlex
W2032040727
Cited by
77
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Materials Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Keywords
methanol crossover, proton-conducting membranes, methanol diffusion coefficient, Nafion 117, diffusion cell, aqueous methanol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review