The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physician fees and procedure intensity: the case of cesarean delivery
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Non‐clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section
Chen, I., Opiyo, N., Tavender, E., Mortazhejri, S., Rader, T., Petkovic, J., Yogasingam, S., Taljaard, M., Agarwal, S., Laopaiboon, M., et al. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005528.pub3 · Cited by 259
Caesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis
Hoxha, I., Syrogiannouli, L., Luta, X., Tal, K., Goodman, D. C., da Costa, B. R., & Jüni, P. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013670 · Cited by 97
Medicaid physician fees and the quality of medical care of Medicaid patients in the USA
Decker, S. L. (2007) · Review of Economics of the Household · doi:10.1007/s11150-007-9000-7 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Gruber, J., Kim, J., & Mayzlin, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Health Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 473-490
- ISSN
- 0167-6296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3025000845
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physician fees and procedure intensity: the case of cesarean delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0167-6296(99)00009-0
- The paper
- Gruber, J., Kim, J., & Mayzlin, D. (1999). Physician fees and procedure intensity: the case of cesarean delivery. Journal of Health Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6296(99)00009-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
