Speech motor control: acoustic goals, saturation effects, auditory feedback and internal models.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Speech targets are defined in both auditory and articulatory terms.
“Many studies suggest instead that speech targets are defined in both auditory and articulatory terms (for arguments on auditory targets see e.g., Perkell et al., 1997 or Guenther et al., 2006; for arguments on articulatory, i.e., somatosensory, targets, see Saltzman and Munhall, 1989, Browman and Goldstein, 1989 or Tremblay et al., 2003; for arguments on auditory-somatosensory targets, see e.g., L”
From The ConDialInt Model: Condensation, Dialogality, and Intentionality Dimensions of Inner Speech Within a Hierarchical Predictive Control Framework (2019) · cites this paper as Perkell et al., 1997
In dynamic speech control, it is unlikely that the phonetic targets of speakers are exclusively specified in terms of spatial configurations (positions and velocities of the speech articulators).
“In the case of dynamic speech control, it is unlikely that the phonetic targets of the speakers are exclusively specified in terms of spatial configurations, i.e., positions and velocities of the speech articulators.”
From The ConDialInt Model: Condensation, Dialogality, and Intentionality Dimensions of Inner Speech Within a Hierarchical Predictive Control Framework (2019) · cites this paper as Perkell et al., 1997
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 177
- Authors
- Perkell, J., Matthies, M., Lane, H., Guenther, F., Wilhelms-Tricarico, R., Wozniak, J., & Guiod, P.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Northeastern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Perkell, Joseph
- ORCID
- Guenther, Frank
- Venue
- Speech Communication
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 227-250
- ISSN
- 0167-6393 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032876136
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Speech Communication (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- speech motor control, auditory feedback, internal models, saturation effects, acoustic transfer function, cochlear implants, vestibular schwannoma, fundamental frequency, speech rate, intelligibility, speech development, articulatory movements, postural parameters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
