Standardisation of soil quality attributes
Abstract
These changed circumstances and the recognition of the often crucial role that soils play within these systems has resulted in a demand for measures of soil quality, similar to those used in the characterisation of water and air. Whilst it is relatively straightforward to quantify the fitness to breathe of air, or the fitness to drink with respect to water, it is considerably more difficult to identify similar criteria to be applied to soil. In part this arises because of the wide range of uses to which soils are put and in part because of the complexity of the soil system and the possibility that changes in the soil may be slow and possibly only occur when some threshold is reached. The paper stresses that any index of soil quality must consider soil function, and these functions are varied and often complex. A soil which is considered to be of high quality for one function may not be so for other functions. As a consequence there are potentially many soil properties which might serve as indicators of soil quality, and research is required to identify the most suitable. It may also be questioned whether it is appropriate to pursue this notion of a limited number of soil quality indicators. If an indicator is chosen comparisons between sites and results from different investigators are not possible unless the methods of analysis are given. Standard methods of soil analysis must be developed. These standard methods are distinct from national standard values, or indicator values frequently set by national governments or regulatory agencies. The International Standardisation Organisation (ISO) has developed a programme for the development of standard methods of soil analysis across a range of possible properties including visible, biological, physical and chemical properties. If it is decided that soil quality indicators are required and progress is to be made on developing acceptable indicators of soil quality with agreed standard methods of determination there is need for co-operation amongst soil scientists and those involved in determining appropriate and sustainable use of the soil.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Soils often react slowly to changes in land use and management, and for that reason it can be more difficult to detect changes in soil quality before non-reversible damage has occurred than for the quality of water and air.
“Soils often react slowly to changes in land use and management, and for that reason it can be more di ffi cult to detect changes in soil quality before non-reversible damage has occurred than for the quality of water and air (Nortcli ff , 2002).”
From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Nortcliff, 2002
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 316
- Authors
- Nortcliff, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Reading (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Nortcliff, Stephen
- Venue
- Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-168
- ISSN
- 0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157184095
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 18.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
- Keywords
- soil quality, soil quality indicators, soil functions, soil quality monitoring, sustainable soil use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review