Cited by 316Soil Science and Environmental ManagementSoil Management and Crop YieldSoil and Land Suitability Analysis

Standardisation of soil quality attributes

Nortcliff, Stephen·2002·Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Abstract

These changed circumstances and the recognition of the often crucial role that soils play within these systems has resulted in a demand for measures of soil quality, similar to those used in the characterisation of water and air. Whilst it is relatively straightforward to quantify the fitness to breathe of air, or the fitness to drink with respect to water, it is considerably more difficult to identify similar criteria to be applied to soil. In part this arises because of the wide range of uses to which soils are put and in part because of the complexity of the soil system and the possibility that changes in the soil may be slow and possibly only occur when some threshold is reached. The paper stresses that any index of soil quality must consider soil function, and these functions are varied and often complex. A soil which is considered to be of high quality for one function may not be so for other functions. As a consequence there are potentially many soil properties which might serve as indicators of soil quality, and research is required to identify the most suitable. It may also be questioned whether it is appropriate to pursue this notion of a limited number of soil quality indicators. If an indicator is chosen comparisons between sites and results from different investigators are not possible unless the methods of analysis are given. Standard methods of soil analysis must be developed. These standard methods are distinct from national standard values, or indicator values frequently set by national governments or regulatory agencies. The International Standardisation Organisation (ISO) has developed a programme for the development of standard methods of soil analysis across a range of possible properties including visible, biological, physical and chemical properties. If it is decided that soil quality indicators are required and progress is to be made on developing acceptable indicators of soil quality with agreed standard methods of determination there is need for co-operation amongst soil scientists and those involved in determining appropriate and sustainable use of the soil.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00253-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Soils often react slowly to changes in land use and management, and for that reason it can be more difficult to detect changes in soil quality before non-reversible damage has occurred than for the quality of water and air.

    “Soils often react slowly to changes in land use and management, and for that reason it can be more di ffi cult to detect changes in soil quality before non-reversible damage has occurred than for the quality of water and air (Nortcli ff , 2002).”

    From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Nortcliff, 2002

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 316

Authors
Nortcliff, S.
Affiliations
University of Reading (GB)
Corresponding author
Nortcliff, Stephen
Venue
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-02
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
161-168
ISSN
0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157184095
Cited by
316
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
FWCI
18.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
Keywords
soil quality, soil quality indicators, soil functions, soil quality monitoring, sustainable soil use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review