The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: above-ground insects
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach
NOSS, R. F. (1990) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x · Cited by 3,151
Ecological Methods with Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations
Smith, P. E., & Southwood, T. R. E. (1979) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936977 · Cited by 2,452
The Balance of Nature? Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities
Dytham, C., & Pimm, S. L. (1993) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5214 · Cited by 890
Southwood, T. R. E. (1978) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7291-0 · Cited by 800
Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: A review
Margules, C., & Usher, M. B. (1981) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(81)90073-2 · Cited by 498
Topping, C. J., & Sunderland, K. D. (1992) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2404516 · Cited by 439
Some features influencing the efficiency of pitfall traps
Luff, M. L. (1975) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00348110 · Cited by 424
Biodiversity: measurement and estimation. Preface
Harper, J. L., & Hawksworth, D. L. (1994) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0081 · Cited by 415
Properties of the Rarefaction Diversity Measurement
Simberloff, D. (1972) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282781 · Cited by 405
Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: An approach at two different scales
Duelli, P. (1997) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(96)01143-7 · Cited by 379
Self-citation
Cited by
Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri‐environment schemes in five European countries
Kleijn, D., Baquero, R. A., Clough, Y., Díaz, M., De Esteban, J., Fernández, F., Gabriel, D., Herzog, F., Holzschuh, A., Jöhl, R., et al. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00869.x · Cited by 1,081
HENDRICKX, F., MAELFAIT, J., VAN WINGERDEN, W., SCHWEIGER, O., SPEELMANS, M., AVIRON, S., AUGENSTEIN, I., BILLETER, R., BAILEY, D., BUKACEK, R., et al. (2007) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01270.x · Cited by 633
Biodiversity indicators: the choice of values and measures
Duelli, P., & Obrist, M. K. (2003) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(03)00072-0 · Cited by 438
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Duelli, P., Obrist, M. K., & Schmatz, D. R.
- Venue
- Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 33-64
- ISSN
- 0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012446911
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: above-ground insects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0167-8809(99)00029-8
- The paper
- Duelli, P., Obrist, M. K., & Schmatz, D. R. (1999). Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: above-ground insects. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8809(99)00029-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.