Low dose effects of bisphenol A on sexual differentiation of the brain and behavior in rats
Abstract
There is an endocrinological concern that environmental endocrine disrupters (EEDs) may influence sexual differentiation. Bisphenol A (BPA), one of EEDs, is released from polycarbonate plastics, and has been detected in the human umbilical cord. In this study, we examined the effect of BPA on the sexual differentiation of open-field behavior and the sexually dimorphic nuclei in the brain in the offspring of rats exposed to BPA during the fetal and suckling periods at a dosage below the human tolerable daily intake (TDI) level. In the control group, females were more active in the open field and had a larger locus coeruleus (LC) volume than males. BPA abolished and inverted the sex differences of the open-field behavior and the LC volume, respectively, without affecting the reproductive system. We also compared the effects of estrogenic compounds, diethylstilbestrol (DES) and resveratrol (RVT), to that of BPA because of their structural similarities. DES affected the open-field behavior, LC volume and reproductive system, while RVT affected the LC volume and the reproductive system. These results suggest that the brain is highly sensitive to BPA at a dosage below TDI and that the disrupting effects of BPA on sexual differentiation may vary from those of RVT and DES.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adult female offspring of dams treated with DES during gestation and via lactation performed more rejection behaviors, such as kicking or fighting, when tested with a sexually experienced male.
“Similarly, adult female offspring of dams treated with DES during gestation and via lactation performed more rejection behaviors, such as kicking or fighting, when tested with a sexually experienced male (Kubo et al., 2003).”
From Developmental Treatment with Ethinyl Estradiol, but Not Bisphenol A, Causes Alterations in Sexually Dimorphic Behaviors in Male and Female Sprague Dawley Rats (2014) · cites this paper as Kubo et al., 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 311
- Authors
- Kubo, K., Arai, O., Omura, M., Watanabe, R., Ogata, R., & Aou, S.
- Affiliations
- Kyushu University (JP)
- Dokkyo University (JP)
- Kyushu Institute of Technology (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Aou, Shuji
- Venue
- Neuroscience Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 345-356
- ISSN
- 0168-0102 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091848665
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 11.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education and Science
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Keywords
- bisphenol A, endocrine disruptors, sexual differentiation, locus coeruleus, open field behavior, diethylstilbestrol, resveratrol, low-dose exposure, reproductive system, sex differences, rats
- MeSH terms
- Resveratrol, Bisphenol A Compounds, Animals, Benzhydryl Compounds, Brain, Diethylstilbestrol, Drug Administration Schedule, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Male, Phenols, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Disorders of Sex Development, Stilbenes, Rats, Wistar, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review