Effects of material hydrophobicity on physical properties of polymeric microspheres formed by double emulsion process
Abstract
Human serum albumin (HSA) was encapsulated as a model protein in microspheres of biodegradable and biocompatible polymers by the water-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) emulsion solvent extraction/evaporation (double emulsion) technique for purpose of controlled release. To improve the properties and control the rate of drug release of the delivery vehicle, materials with different hydrophobicity from that of their conventional counterparts, such as poly(lactide-co-ethylene glycol) (PELA) in place of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) as the polymer matrix, ethyl acetate/acetone in place of dichloride methane (DCM) as the (co)solvent and d-alpha tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (vitamin E TPGS) as the additive, were used to prepare the microspheres. It has been found that PELA microspheres, compared with PLGA ones, were slightly smaller in size if prepared at identical emulsification strength. They had more porous surface and internal structure, higher encapsulation efficiency (EE) and more rapid in vitro release rate. Furthermore, the physical properties of the microspheres were also affected by the presence of solvents and additives and their properties. Our results suggest that these materials could have interesting potential applications in preparation of polymeric microspheres for controlled protein release.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The w/o/w method is relatively simple and economic, but it can have low encapsulation efficiency or payload and a large initial burst release because organic solvent removal is slow.
“Although this w/o/w method is a relatively simple and economic technique [9], the sometimes low encapsulation efficiency or payload as well as the huge initial burst release, because of the limited speed of removal of organic solvent, are disadvantageous [10].”
From Use of lectin-functionalized particles for oral immunotherapy (2012) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 93
- Authors
- Ruan, G., Feng, S.-S., & Li, Q.-T.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Feng, Si-Shen
- ORCID
- Ruan, Gang
- Venue
- Journal of Controlled Release
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 151-160
- ISSN
- 0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083719812
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Controlled Release (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
- Keywords
- polymer microspheres, double emulsion, water-in-oil-in-water emulsion, protein delivery, pelA, PLGA, polymer hydrophobicity, solvent effects, vitamin E TPGS, encapsulation efficiency, controlled release, microsphere morphology, porosity
- MeSH terms
- Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer, Delayed-Action Preparations, Drug Carriers, Drug Compounding, Emulsions, Humans, Kinetics, Lactates, Materials Testing, Microspheres, Particle Size, Polyethylene Glycols, Polyglycolic Acid, Polymers, Serum Albumin, Surface Properties, Lactic Acid, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review