CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 121EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: passive versus active tasks and stimulus modality

Mertens, Ralf, Polich, John·1997·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section
DOI 10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00041-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The P300 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP) was elicited with auditory and visual stimuli in separate experiments. Each study compared an oddball paradigm that presented both target and standard stimuli with a single-stimulus paradigm that presented a target but no standard stimuli. Subjects were instructed in different conditions either to ignore the stimuli, press a response key to the target, or maintain a mental count of the targets. For the passive ignore conditions, P300 amplitude from the single-stimulus paradigm was larger than that from the oddball paradigm. For the active tasks, P300 amplitude from the oddball paradigm was larger than that from the single-stimulus paradigm. For the press and count conditions, P300 amplitude and latency were highly similar for the oddball and single-stimulus procedures. The findings suggest that the single-stimulus paradigm can provide reliable cognitive measures in clinical/applied testing for both passive and active response conditions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00041-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Bruder, 1995, Brain event-related potentials to complex tones in depressed patients: relations to perceptual asymmetry and clinical features, Psychophysiology, 32, 373, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb01220.x · DOI
  2. Cass, M. and Polich, J. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: auditory intensity and tone frequency effects. Biol. Psychol., 1997, in press. · DOI
  3. Cohen, J. and Polich, J. On the number of trials needed for P300. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1997, 25: 249–255. · DOI
  4. Courchesne, 1978, Changes in P300 waves with event repetition: long-term effects on scalp distribution and amplitude, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 45, 754, 10.1016/0013-4694(78)90143-8 · DOI
  5. Courchesne, 1975, Stimulus novelty, task relevance, and the visual evoked potential in man, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 39, 131, 10.1016/0013-4694(75)90003-6 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Donchin, E., Kramer, A.F. and Wickens, C. Applications of brain event-related potentials to problems in engineering psychology. In: M.G.H. Coles, E. Donchin and S.W. Porges (Eds.), Psychophysiology: Systems, Processes, and Applications. Guilford Press, New York, 1986, pp. 702–718.
  7. Emmerson, 1990, P3 latency and symbol digit correlations in aging, Exp. Aging Res., 15, 151, 10.1080/03610738908259769 · DOI
  8. Fabiani, 1990, Effects of mnemonic strategy manipulation in a von Restorff paradigm, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 75, 22, 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90149-E · DOI
  9. Ford, 1981, Event-related potentials (ERPs) to interruptions of a steady rhythm, Psychophysiology, 18, 322, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb03043.x · DOI
  10. Ford, 1976, Auditory evoked potentials to unpredictable shifts in pitch, Psychophysiology, 13, 32, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1976.tb03333.x · DOI
  11. Hirano, 1996, Habituation of P300 and reflex motor (startle blink) responses to repetitive startling stimuli in children, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 22, 97, 10.1016/0167-8760(96)00018-9 · DOI
  12. Humphrey, 1994, Toward a psychophysiological assessment of dynamic changes in mental workload, Hum. Factors, 36, 3, 10.1177/001872089403600101 · DOI
  13. Johnson, R. The amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related potentials: review and synthesis. In: P. Ackles, J.R. Jennings and M.G.H. Coles (Eds.), Advances in Psychophysiology: A Research Annual, Vol. 3. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1988, pp. 69–137.
  14. Johnson, 1993, On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential, Psychophysiology, 30, 90, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03208.x · DOI
  15. Katayama, 1996, P300 from one-, two-, and three-stimulus auditory paradigms, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 23, 33, 10.1016/0167-8760(96)00030-X · DOI
  16. Lammers, 1989, Habituation of P300 to target stimuli, Physiol. Behav., 45, 595, 10.1016/0031-9384(89)90079-6 · DOI
  17. McCarthy, 1985, Scalp distribution of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 62, 203, 10.1016/0168-5597(85)90015-2 · DOI
  18. McIsaac, 1992, Comparison of infant and adult P300 from auditory stimuli, J. Exp. Child Psychol., 53, 115, 10.1016/0022-0965(92)90044-7 · DOI
  19. Oades, 1995, The topography of event-related potentials in passive and active conditions of a 3-tone auditory oddball test, Int. J. Neurosci., 81, 249, 10.3109/00207459509004890 · DOI
  20. O'Donnell, 1990, Active and passive P300 latency in dementia, Neuropsychiat. Neuropsychol. Behav. Neurol., 3, 164
  21. O'Donnell, 1992, Active and passive P3 latency and psychometric performance: influence of age and individual differences, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 12, 187, 10.1016/0167-8760(92)90010-9 · DOI
  22. Ornitz, 1996, Autonomic, electroencephalographic, and myogenic activity accompanying startle and its habituation during mid-childhood, Psychophysiology, 33, 507, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb02426.x · DOI
  23. Paller, 1992, Potentials evoked in human and monkey medial temporal lobe during auditory and visual oddball paradigms, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 84, 260, 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90008-Y · DOI
  24. Pfefferbaum, 1989, P300 in schizophrenia is affected by stimulus modality, response requirements, medication status and negative symptoms, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 46, 1035, 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110077011 · DOI
  25. Polich, J. Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1986a, 63: 251–259. · DOI
  26. Polich, J. P300 development from auditory stimuli. Psychophysiology, 1986b, 23: 590–597. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Polich, J. Comparison of P300 from a passive tone sequence paradigm and an active discrimination task. Psychophysiology, 1987a, 24: 41–46. · DOI
  28. Polich, J. Response mode and P300 from auditory stimuli. Biol. Psychol., 1987b, 25: 61–71. · DOI
  29. Polich, 1988, Bifurcated P300 peaks: P3a and P3b revisited?, J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 5, 287, 10.1097/00004691-198807000-00004 · DOI
  30. Polich, J. Habituation of P300 from auditory stimuli. Psychobiology, 1989a, 17: 19–28. · DOI
  31. Polich, J. P300 from a passive auditory paradigm. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1989b, 74: 312–320. · DOI
  32. Polich, 1996, Meta-analysis of P300 normative aging studies, Psychophysiology, 33, 334, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb01058.x · DOI
  33. Polich, 1996, P300 topography and modality effects from a single-stimulus paradigm, Psychophysiology, 33, 747, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb02371.x · DOI
  34. Polich, J. and Margala, C. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: target probability effects. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1997, 25: 169–176. · DOI
  35. Polich, 1992, P300, cognitive capability, and personality: a correlational study of university undergraduates, Person. Ind. Diff., 13, 533, 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90194-T · DOI
  36. Polich, 1994, Comparison of auditory P300 habituation from active and passive conditions, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 17, 25, 10.1016/0167-8760(94)90052-3 · DOI
  37. Polich, 1986, P300 latency reflects the degree of cognitive decline in dementing illness, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 63, 138, 10.1016/0013-4694(86)90007-6 · DOI
  38. Polich, 1990, P300 assessment of early Alzheimer's disease, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 77, 179, 10.1016/0168-5597(90)90036-D · DOI
  39. Polich, J., Eischen, S.E. and Collins, G.E. P300 from a single auditory stimulus. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1994a, 92: 253–261. · DOI
  40. Polich, J., Pollock, V.E. and Bloom, F.E. Meta-analysis of P300 amplitude from males at risk for alcoholism. Psychol. Bull., 1994b, 115: 55–73. · DOI
  41. Ritter, 1968, Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: a study of short term changes in averaged evoked responses, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 25, 550, 10.1016/0013-4694(68)90234-4 · DOI
  42. Ritter, 1972, Association cortex potentials and reaction time in auditory discrimination, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 33, 547, 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90245-3 · DOI
  43. Romero, 1996, P300 habituation from auditory and visual stimuli, Physiol. Behav., 59, 517, 10.1016/0031-9384(95)02099-3 · DOI
  44. Roth, 1973, Auditory evoked responses to unpredictable stimuli, Psychophysiology, 10, 125, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1973.tb01097.x · DOI
  45. Roth, 1982, Auditory stimulus intensity effects on components of the late positive complex, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 54, 132, 10.1016/0013-4694(82)90155-9 · DOI
  46. Roth, 1984, Intensity and task effects on evoked physiological responses to noise bursts, Psychophysiology, 21, 466, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1984.tb00228.x · DOI
  47. Sommer, 1990, Consciousness of attention and expectancy as reflected in event-related potentials and reaction times, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cog., 16, 902, 10.1037/0278-7393.16.5.902 · DOI
  48. Squires, 1975, Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 38, 387, 10.1016/0013-4694(75)90263-1 · DOI
  49. Sugg, 1995, P300 from auditory stimuli: intensity and frequency effects, Biol. Psychol., 41, 255, 10.1016/0301-0511(95)05136-8 · DOI
  50. Wickens, 1983, The performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information processing resources, Science, 221, 1080, 10.1126/science.6879207 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 121

Metadata

Authors
Mertens, R., & Polich, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Polich, John
ORCID
Polich, John
Venue
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-11
Volume
104
Issue
6
Pages
488-497
ISSN
0168-5597 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00041-5
OpenAlex
W1979885038
Cited by
121
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Arizona
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da008363-03)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA0068420)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01-DA08363)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
P300, event-related potentials, oddball paradigm, stimulus modality, auditory stimuli, visual stimuli, target detection, response inhibition, clinical evaluation
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Event-Related Potentials, P300

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review