The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The species concept for prokaryotes
Abstract
Trabajo presentado en la 113th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, celebrada en Denver, Estados Unidos, del 18 al 21 de mayo de 2013
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reduced diversity of faecal microbiota in Crohn’s disease revealed by a metagenomic approach
Manichanh, C., Rigottier-Gois, L., Bonnaud, E., Gloux, K., Pelletier, E., Frangeul, L., Nalin, R., Jarrin, C., Chardon, P., Marteau, P., et al. (2006) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2005.073817 · Cited by 2,277
Chun, J., Lee, J.-H., Jung, Y., Kim, M., Kim, S., Kim, B. K., & Lim, Y.-W. (2007) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64915-0 · Cited by 2,105
Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems
Torsvik, V., & Øvreås, L. (2002) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5274(02)00324-7 · Cited by 1,922
Prokaryotic Diversity--Magnitude, Dynamics, and Controlling Factors
Torsvik, V., Øvreås, L., & Thingstad, T. F. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1071698 · Cited by 1,196
The soil metagenome – a rich resource for the discovery of novel natural products
Daniel, R. (2004) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2004.04.005 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosselló-Mora, R.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-67
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2899643364
- Cited by
- 717
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The species concept for prokaryotes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0168-6445(00)00040-1
- The paper
- Rosselló-Mora, R. (2001). The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-6445(00)00040-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
