The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Grazing of protozoa and its effect on populations of aquatic bacteria
Open accessAbstract
Predation by bacterivorous protists in aquatic habitats can influence the morphological structure, taxonomic composition and physiological status of bacterial communities. The protistan grazing can result in bacterial responses at the community and the species level. At the community level, grazing-induced morphological shifts have been observed, which were directed towards either larger or smaller bacterial sizes or in both directions. Morphological changes have been accompanied by changes in taxonomic community structure and bacterial activity. Responses at the species level vary from species to species. Some taxa have shown a pronounced morphological plasticity and demonstrated complete or partial shifts in size distribution to larger growth forms (filaments, microcolonies). However, other taxa with weak plasticity have shown no ability to reduce grazing mortality through changes in size. The impact of protistan grazing on bacterial communities is based on the complex interplay of several parameters. These include grazing selectivity (by size and other features), differences in sensitivity of bacterial species to grazing, differences in responses of single bacterial populations to grazing (size and physiology), as well as the direct and indirect influence of grazing on bacterial growth conditions (substrate supply) and bacterial competition (elimination of competitors).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Šimek, K., Pernthaler, J., Weinbauer, M. G., Hornák, K., Dolan, J. R., Nedoma, J., Mašı́n, M., & Amann, R. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.6.2723-2733.2001 · Cited by 363
Hahn, M. W., Lünsdorf, H., Wu, Q., Schauer, M., Höfle, M. G., Boenigk, J., & Stadler, P. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.3.1442-1451.2003 · Cited by 284
Self-citationMatz, C., Bergfeld, T., Rice, S. A., & Kjelleberg, S. (2004) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00556.x · Cited by 200
Böer, S. I., Hedtkamp, S. I. C., van Beusekom, J. E. E., Fuhrman, J. A., Boetius, A., & Ramette, A. (2009) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.29 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Hahn, M.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-121
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068002087
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grazing of protozoa and its effect on populations of aquatic bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0168-6496(00)00098-2
- The paper
- Hahn, M. (2001). Grazing of protozoa and its effect on populations of aquatic bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-6496(00)00098-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.