The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial populations associated with mycelium of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The influences of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices on the culturable aerobic-heterotrophic bacterial communities in the rhizosphere and hyphosphere of cucumber plants (Cucumis satvius) were investigated. Mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants were grown in compartmentalised growth units, each with a root compartment and two lateral root-free compartments. Samples representing rhizosphere, root-free soil, root-free sand and washed sand extract were collected 52 days after sowing from treatments both with and without mycorrhiza. No significant difference in total bacterial number was observed between the mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal treatment. Fourteen hundred bacterial colonies were isolated and identified by fatty acid methyl ester analysis using the Sherlock system (MIDI Inc.), 87 species within 48 genera were identified with a similarity index >0.30. Pseudomonas, Arthrobacter and Burkholderia were the genera most frequently encountered. Large differences in bacterial community structure were observed between rhizosphere soil, root-free soil/sand and washed sand extract, whereas major differences between mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal treatments were observed for a few bacterial species only. Isolates identified as Paenibacillus spp. were more frequently found in the mycorrhizal treatment and especially in the washed sand extract with mycelium of G. intraradices, indicating that bacteria within this genus may live in close association with mycelium of these fungi.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mahaffee, W. F., & Kloepper, J. W. (1997) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s002489900050 · Cited by 254
Cited by
Mycorrhizas and soil structure
Rillig, M. C., & Mummey, D. L. (2006) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01750.x · Cited by 1,761
Rashid, M. I., Mujawar, L. H., Shahzad, T., Almeelbi, T., Ismail, I. M. I., & Oves, M. (2016) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.007 · Cited by 894
Arbuscular mycorrhizae and terrestrial ecosystem processes
Rillig, M. C. (2004) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00620.x · Cited by 606
Prospects and limitations for mycorrhizas in biocontrol of root pathogens
Whipps, J. M. (2004) · Canadian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1139/b04-082 · Cited by 508
Toljander, J. F., Lindahl, B. D., Paul, L. R., Elfstrand, M., & Finlay, R. D. (2007) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00337.x · Cited by 450
Metadata
- Authors
- Mansfeld-Giese, K., Larsen, J., & Bödker, L.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-140
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093334183
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial populations associated with mycelium of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0168-6496(02)00265-9
- The paper
- Mansfeld-Giese, K., Larsen, J., & Bödker, L. (2002). Bacterial populations associated with mycelium of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-6496(02)00265-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.