The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using ecological diversity measures with bacterial communities
Open accessAbstract
Abstract There are many ecological diversity measures, but their suitability for use with highly diverse bacterial communities is unclear and seldom considered. We assessed a range of species richness and evenness/dominance indices, and the use of species abundance models using samples of bacteria from zinc-contaminated and control soils. Bacteria were assigned to operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis of 236 clones from each soil. The reduced diversity apparent in the contaminated soil was reflected by the diversity indices to varying degrees. The number of clones analysed and the weighting given to rare vs. abundant OTUs are the most important considerations when selecting measures. Our preferences, arrived at using theory and practical experience, include: the log series index alpha; the Q statistic (but only if coverage is 50% or more); the Berger-Parker and Simpson's indices, although their ecological relevance may be limited; and, unexpectedly, the Shannon-Wiener and Shannon evenness indices, even though their meanings may not be clear and their values inaccurate when coverage is low. For extrapolation, the equation for the log series distribution seems the best for extrapolating from OTU accumulation curves while non-parametric methods, such as Chao 1, show promise for estimating total OTU richness. Due to a preponderance of single-occurrence OTUs, none of the five species abundance models fit the OTU abundance distribution of the control soil, but both the log and log normal models fit the less diverse contaminated soil. Species abundance models are useful, irrespective of coverage, because they address the whole distribution of a sample, aiding comparison by revealing overall trends as well as specific changes in particular abundance classes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement
Magurran, A. E. (1988) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0 · Cited by 10,879
Gotelli, N. J., & Colwell, R. K. (2001) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x · Cited by 6,420
Diversity and Evenness: A Unifying Notation and Its Consequences
Hill, M. O. (1973) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1934352 · Cited by 6,344
Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity
Faith, D. P. (1992) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3 · Cited by 5,693
Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine
Wiener, N. (2019) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11810.001.0001 · Cited by 5,009
Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation
Colwell, R. K., & Coddington, J. A. (1994) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0091 · Cited by 4,530
Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population
Chao, A. (1984) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · Cited by 4,265
The Nonconcept of Species Diversity: A Critique and Alternative Parameters
Hurlbert, S. H. (1971) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1934145 · Cited by 4,183
DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition
Zhou, J., Bruns, M. A., & Tiedje, J. M. (1996) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.62.2.316-322.1996 · Cited by 2,880
Cited by
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
Microbiota of Human Breast Tissue
Urbaniak, C., Cummins, J., Brackstone, M., Macklaim, J. M., Gloor, G. B., Baban, C. K., Scott, L., O'Hanlon, D. M., Burton, J. P., Francis, K. P., et al. (2014) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00242-14 · Cited by 552
Impact of wheat straw decomposition on successional patterns of soil microbial community structure.
Bastian, F., Bouziri, L., Nicolardot, B., & Ranjard, L. (2009) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.10.024 · Cited by 433
Spatial Ecology of Bacteria at the Microscale in Soil
Raynaud, X., & Nunan, N. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087217 · Cited by 401
Legacy effects of drought on plant–soil feedbacks and plant–plant interactions
Kaisermann, A., de Vries, F. T., Griffiths, R. I., & Bardgett, R. D. (2017) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14661 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Hill, T. C. J., Walsh, K. A., Harris, J. A., & Moffett, B. F.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2003-02-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129297365
- Cited by
- 1,020
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 13.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using ecological diversity measures with bacterial communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0168-6496(02)00449-x
- The paper
- Hill, T. C. J., Walsh, K. A., Harris, J. A., & Moffett, B. F. (2003). Using ecological diversity measures with bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-6496(02)00449-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.