Osmotic stimulation of microcolony development by Nitrosomonas europaea
Open accessAbstract
In liquid cultures low levels of salt (0.1 M NaCl) had no effect on the growth rate of proliferating cells of Nitrosomonas europaea (NCIMB 11850), while at higher salt concentrations the growth rate was progressively reduced. A technique which enabled enumeration of microcolony-forming cells after just a few days incubation on the surface of membrane filters was subsequently used to investigate the effects of medium osmolarity and osmoprotectants on the ability to initiate cell division in single cells from liquid cultures. Typically, only ∼50% of the cells from early stationary phase cultures in basal medium was able to initiate cell division and form microcolonies during subsequent incubation on filters on the same medium. However, the fraction of cells forming microcolonies was stimulated by low levels of salt, while higher concentrations were inhibitory. A range of bacterial compatible solutes (betaine, trehalose, proline, MOPS, taurine and GABA) were unable to enhance microcolony formation at inhibitory salt concentrations. Other solutes (KCl, LiCl, mannitol, sucrose) also stimulated microcolony development, demonstrating that the effect was osmotic. A low salt (0.1 M NaCl) shock prior to incubation at inhibitory salt levels dramatically increased the number of cells forming microcolonies. A comparative study of several Nitrosospira spp. indicated that osmotic stimulation of microcolony development may be specific to N. europaea, although the proportion of cells able to form microcolonies was much smaller in the Nitrosospira spp. examined. Taken together these results suggest that while inhibition of growth in N. europaea by high osmolarity may be similar to that observed in other bacteria, the osmotic stimulation observed for initiation of cell division may have important implications for the successful establishment and recovery of this nitrifier in biofilms and in soil.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Wood, N. J., & Sørensen, J.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-183
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6941
- OpenAlex
- W2036304837
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Keywords
- Nitrosomonas europaea, microcolony formation, osmotic stimulation, salt stress, osmoprotectants, osmolytes, cell division initiation, nitrifying bacteria, Nitrosospira, osmolarity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review