The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Turnover of glucose and acetate coupled to reduction of nitrate, ferric iron and sulfate and to methanogenesis in anoxic rice field soil
Open accessAbstract
Turnover of glucose and acetate in the presence of active reduction of nitrate, ferric iron and sulfate was investigated in anoxic rice field soil by using [U-(14)C]glucose and [2-(14)C]acetate. The turnover of glucose was not much affected by addition of ferrihydrite or sulfate, but was partially inhibited (60%) by addition of nitrate. Nitrate addition also strongly reduced acetate production from glucose while ferrihydrite and sulfate addition did not. These results demonstrate that ferric iron and sulfate reducers did not outcompete fermenting bacteria for glucose at endogenous concentrations. Nitrate reducers may have done so, but glucose fermentation may also have been inhibited by accumulation of toxic denitrification intermediates (nitrite, NO, N(2)O). Addition of nitrate resulted in complete inhibition of CH(4) production from [U-(14)C]glucose and [2-(14)C]acetate. However, addition of ferrihydrite or sulfate decreased the production of (14)CH(4) from [U-(14)C]glucose by only 70 and 65%, respectively. None of the electron acceptors significantly increased the production of (14)CO(2) from [U-(14)C]glucose, but all increased the production of (14)CO(2) from [2-(14)C]acetate. Uptake of acetate was faster in the presence of either nitrate, ferrihydrite or sulfate than in the unamended control. Addition of ferrihydrite and sulfate reduced (14)CH(4) production from [2-(14)C]acetate by 83 and 92%, respectively. Chloroform completely inhibited the methanogenic consumption of acetate. It also inhibited the oxidation of acetate, completely in the presence of sulfate, but not in the presence of nitrate or ferrihydrite. Our results show that, besides the possible toxic effect of products of nitrate reduction (NO, NO(2)(-) and N(2)O) on methanogens, nitrate reducers, ferric iron reducers and sulfate reducers were active enough to outcompete methanogens for acetate and channeling the flow of electrons away from CH(4) towards CO(2) production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: A review
Le Mer, J., & Roger, P. (2001) · European Journal of Soil Biology · doi:10.1016/s1164-5563(01)01067-6 · Cited by 2,123
Methane Production and Conductive Materials: A Critical Review
Martins, G., Salvador, A. F., Pereira, L., & Alves, M. M. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b01913 · Cited by 432
Reduction of Fe(III) oxide by methanogens in the presence and absence of extracellular quinones
Bond, D. R., & Lovley, D. R. (2002) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00279.x · Cited by 264
A Review of Methods to Determine Viability, Vitality, and Metabolic Rates in Microbiology
Braissant, O., Astasov-Frauenhoffer, M., Waltimo, T., & Bonkat, G. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.547458 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Chidthaisong, A., & Conrad, R.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-86
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142042142
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Turnover of glucose and acetate coupled to reduction of nitrate, ferric iron and sulfate and to methanogenesis in anoxic rice field soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0168-6496(99)00083-5
- The paper
- Chidthaisong, A., & Conrad, R. (2000). Turnover of glucose and acetate coupled to reduction of nitrate, ferric iron and sulfate and to methanogenesis in anoxic rice field soil. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-6496(99)00083-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.