Cited by 289Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Injection related anxiety in insulin-treated diabetes

Zambanini, Andrew, Newson, Roger B., Maisey, Mari, Feher, Michael D.·1999·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

The presence of injection related anxiety and phobia may influence compliance, glycaemic control and quality of life in patients with insulin-treated diabetes. Unselected consecutive, insulin-treated patients attending a diabetes clinic for follow-up, completed a standardised questionnaire providing an injection anxiety score (IAS) and general anxiety score (GAS). A total of 115 insulin-treated (80 Type 1 and 35 Type 2) diabetic patients completed the questionnaire. Injections had been avoided secondary to anxiety in 14% of cases and 42% expressed concern at having to inject more frequently. An IAS > or = 3 was seen in 28% of patients and of these, 66% injected insulin one to two times/day, 45% had avoided injections, and 70% would be bothered by more frequent injections. A significant correlation between IAS and GAS was seen (Kendall's tau-a 0.30, 95% CI 0.19-0.41, P < 0.001). GAS was significantly associated with both previous injection avoidance and expressed concern at increased injection frequency. No significant correlation was seen with HbA1c and injection or general anxiety scores. Symptoms relating to insulin injection anxiety and phobia have a high prevalence in an unselected group of diabetic patients requiring insulin injections and are associated with higher levels of general anxiety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0168-8227(99)00099-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 289

Authors
Zambanini, A., Newson, R. B., Maisey, M., & Feher, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital (GB)
  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-12
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
239-246
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138181294
Cited by
289
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
insulin-treated diabetes, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, injection frequency, general anxiety, medication adherence, glycemic control, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Injections, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review