Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Noninvasive in vivo quantitative assessment of fat content in human liver

Open access
Ricci, Claudio, Longo, Renata, Gioulis, Eugenio, Bosco, Marco, Pollesello, Piero, Masutti, Flora, Crocè, Lory S., Paoletti, Sergio, Bernard, Benedetto de, Tiribelli, Claudio, Palma, Ludovico Dalla·1997·Journal of Hepatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Since the introduction of ultrasonography, liver steatosis has become an increasingly frequent diagnosis. Both ultrasonography (US) and computerized tomography (CT) provide qualitative rather than quantitative assessment of fatty infiltration. The objective of this study was to develop a noninvasive method for the quantification of the hepatic fat content in vivo. A test object containing solutions with CT scan density (CTD) similar to normal liver ("liver-equivalent") or "fat-equivalent material" in variable proportions was prepared to measure patients with variable degrees of steatosis in vivo. RESULTS: A linear correlation (r=0.99, p<0.001) linked CTD and the increasing percentage of fat-equivalent material. A CTD calibration curve was derived as a reference for the in vivo determinations. In 29 consecutive patients with steatosis diagnosed by histology, CTD was linearly correlated (r=0.83, p<0.001) with the hepatic fat content (HFC) expressed as percent of the whole liver, obtained by a computerized histomorphometric analysis. Based on the calibration curve obtained in 29 subjects who underwent liver biopsy, 38 additional consecutive steatotic patients were examined and the degree of hepatic fat content was calculated. The HFC was linearly correlated (r=-0.86, p<0.001) with the liver-to-spleen ratio. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the use of test objects allows an accurate and reproducible noninvasive quantitative assessment of hepatic fat infiltration in humans. This technique may prove useful in the evaluation of the natural course and treatment of hepatic steatosis as well as in the assessment of donor livers prior to transplantation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0168-8278(97)80288-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Ricci, C., Longo, R., Gioulis, E., Bosco, M., Pollesello, P., Masutti, F., Crocè, L. S., Paoletti, S., Bernard, B. D., Tiribelli, C., & Palma, L. D.
Venue
Journal of Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-07
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
108-113
ISSN
0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092536422
Cited by
314
References
2
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noninvasive in vivo quantitative assessment of fat content in human liver. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0168-8278(97)80288-7
The paper
Ricci, C., Longo, R., Gioulis, E., Bosco, M., Pollesello, P., Masutti, F., Crocè, L. S., Paoletti, S., Bernard, B. D., Tiribelli, C., & Palma, L. D. (1997). Noninvasive in vivo quantitative assessment of fat content in human liver. Journal of Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-8278(97)80288-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.