Cited by 244Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeEconomic and Environmental ValuationHealth disparities and outcomes

Health-related quality of life by disease and socio-economic group in the general population in Sweden

Burström, Kristina, Johannesson, Magnus, Diderichsen, Finn·2001·Health Policy

Abstract

Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) on population level, is becoming increasingly important for priority setting in health policy. In the health economics field, it is common to measure HRQoL in terms of health-state utilities or QoL weights. This study investigates the feasibility of obtaining mean QoL weights by mapping survey data to the generic HRQoL measure EQ-5D and to describe the HRQoL in terms of mean QoL weights in certain disease and socio-economic groups. Data from the 1996-1997 Survey of Living Conditions, interviews with a representative sample (16-84 years) of the Swedish population (n=11 698) were used. The mean QoL weight decreased from 0.91 among the youngest to 0.61 among the oldest, and was lower for women than for men. The QoL weight was 0.88 in the highest socio-economic group and 0.78 in the lowest socio-economic group. The QoL weight was lowest (0.38) among persons with depression and highest among persons with hypertension (0.71). The QoL weight decreased from 0.95 for persons with very good global self-rated health to 0.20 for persons with very poor global self-rated health. The results support the feasibility and validity of the mapping approach. HRQoL varies greatly between socio-economic groups and different disease groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00111-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 244

Authors
Burström, K., Johannesson, M., & Diderichsen, F.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Stockholm School of Economics (SE)
Corresponding author
Burström, Kristina
Venue
Health Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-01
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
51-69
ISSN
0168-8510 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972739397
Cited by
244
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
19.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Stockholms Läns Landsting
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
health-related quality of life, EQ-5D, socioeconomic status, disease groups, depression, hypertension, self-rated health, age differences, gender differences
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Feasibility Studies, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Social Class, Sweden, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review