Cited by 92Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsIon Channels and ReceptorsMast cells and histamine

Gene expression of histamine H1 receptor in guinea pig primary sensory neurons: a relationship between H1 receptor mRNA-expressing neurons and peptidergic neurons

Kashiba, Hitoshi, Fukui, Hiroyuki, Morikawa, Yoshihiro, Senba, Emiko·1999·Molecular Brain Research

Abstract

Pharmacological studies have suggested that a subgroup of primary sensory neurons is responsive to histamine via the histamine H1 receptor. We addressed this issue using in situ hybridization histochemistry with a cRNA probe for the guinea pig H1 receptor gene. About 15% of the trigeminal and lumber dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons, but none of nodose ganglion neurons, were intensely labeled with this probe. The H1 receptor mRNA-positive neurons were exclusively small in size, and were demonstrated to give rise to unmyelinated fibers by ultrastructural analysis of isolectin B4-labeling. However, the H1 receptor mRNA-expressing DRG neurons were not immunoreactive to substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). A marked increase in the number of mRNA-positive DRG neurons were observed 1-5 days after a crush injury of the sciatic nerve (3-4-fold of the control value). These neurons turned mRNA-positive after the nerve crush were also mainly small-sized. The mRNA signals were detected in many peptidergic (SP/CGRP) neurons, in contrast to the normal state. On the other hand, in the neurons which showed intense labeling in the normal condition, the mRNA signals were down-regulated. These results suggest that primary sensory neurons include two kinds of H1 receptor-expressing sensory neurons, one expressing H1 receptor mRNAs in the normal state and the other up-regulating the mRNAs following the peripheral nerve damage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0169-328x(98)00346-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 92

Authors
Kashiba, H., Fukui, H., Morikawa, Y., & Senba, E.
Affiliations
  • Tokushima University (JP)
  • Wakayama Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Senba, Emiko
Venue
Molecular Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-03
Volume
66
Issue
1-2
Pages
24-34
ISSN
0169-328X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969816505
Cited by
92
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
Keywords
histamine H1 receptor, primary sensory neurons, dorsal root ganglia, trigeminal ganglion, nodose ganglion, peptidergic neurons, substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide, nerve crush injury, peripheral nerve injury, mRNA expression, unmyelinated nerve fibers, receptor up-regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cholera Toxin, Ganglia, Spinal, Guinea Pigs, Horseradish Peroxidase, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Neurons, Afferent, Receptors, Histamine H1, RNA, Messenger, Sciatic Nerve, Substance P, Down-Regulation, Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide, Up-Regulation, Gene Expression, In Situ Hybridization, Axotomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review