The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of nanosecond laser ablation at 1064 and 308 nm wavelength
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Torrisi et al. [105] compared the effects of wavelength on solid Cu using Nd:YAG (λ = 1064 nm) and XeCl excimer laser (λ = 308 nm) and showed that ultraviolet laser is more efficient in evaporating the Cu atoms, even though IR radiation has higher kinetic energy and plasma temperature.”
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Hoffmann, 2000, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B, 161–163, 9, 10.1016/S0168-583X(99)00666-7 · DOI
- Torrisi, 2001, Phys. Med., XVII, 227
- Mroz, 1994, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 65, 1272, 10.1063/1.1145031 · DOI
- Nassisi, 1994, J. Appl. Phys., 76, 3769, 10.1063/1.357380 · DOI
- D.B. Chrisey, G.K. Hubler, in: D.B. Chrisey, G.K. Hubler (Eds.), Pulsed Laser Deposition of Thin Films, Wiley, New York, 1994.
- Gammino, 2000, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 71, 1119, 10.1063/1.1150402 · DOI
- Nassisi, 2002, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 188, 267, 10.1016/S0168-583X(01)01111-9 · DOI
- Torrisi, 2000, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 71, 4330, 10.1063/1.1287628 · DOI
- Torrisi, 2001, . Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B, 184, 327, 10.1016/S0168-583X(01)00790-X · DOI
- Torrisi, 2001, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 72, 68, 10.1063/1.1328404 · DOI
- Krebs, 1993, Appl. Phys. Lett., 62, 2341, 10.1063/1.109412 · DOI
- D.B. Geohegan, Diagnostic and characteristics of pulsed laser deposition laser plasmas from pulsed laser deposition of thin films, in: D.B. Chrisey, G.K. Hubler (Eds.), Wiley, New York, 1994, p. 115, Chapter 5.
- Hasegawa, 2000, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 161–163, 1104, 10.1016/S0168-583X(99)00985-4 · DOI
- Torrisi, 2002, J. Appl. Phys., 91, 18, 10.1063/1.1446660 · DOI
- Moon, 1999, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 20, 1101
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Subhan, A., Mourad, A.-H. I., & Al-Douri, Y. (2022) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano12132144 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Torrisi, L., Gammino, S., Andò, L., Nassisi, V, Doria, D., & Pedone, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Messina (IT)
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (IT)
- University of Salento (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Pedone, A
- Venue
- Applied Surface Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 210
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 262-273
- ISSN
- 0169-4332 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047082169
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Applied Surface Science (publishedVersion)
- INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Laser Material Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
- Keywords
- laser ablation, copper, nanosecond laser pulses, 1064 nm, 308 nm, ultraviolet laser, infrared laser, ablation threshold, laser-produced plasma, ion velocity, plasma temperature, ionization state, ablation mechanism, Nd:YAG laser, XeCl laser
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review