The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of farmers' indigenous soil and water conservation investments in semi-arid India
Open accessAbstract
This paper investigates the determinants of farmers' indigenous soil and water conservation investments in the semi-arid tropics of India. A simple theoretical model is used to develop hypotheses about the determinants of investment under alternative factor market conditions, and these are tested using data on conservation investment from three villages. We find that conservation investment is significantly lower on leased land in two of the study villages and lower on plots that are subject to sales restrictions in one village, suggesting the potential for land market reforms to increase conservation investment. In one village, households with more adult males, more farm servants, and less land invest more in conservation, as predicted by the model of imperfect labor markets; and households with more debt and off-farm income invest more, consistent with the model of imperfect credit markets. Evidence that conservation investment is affected by factor market imperfections is weaker in the other villages, where investments are much larger, suggesting transaction costs as the source of the differences between villages. Other factors that have a significant effect on investment include the farmer's education and caste, characteristics of the plot (size, slope, irrigation status, and quality ranking) and the presence of existing land investments. The results suggest the importance of accounting for differences across communities and households in factor market and agroclimatic conditions in designing programs to promote investments in soil and water conservation. © 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information
Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981) · Columbia University · doi:10.7916/d8v12ft1 · Cited by 12,769
Cited by
Hassan, R., Nhemachena, C., Hassan, R. M., & Nhemachena, C. (2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.56969 · Cited by 745
Amsalu, A., & de Graaff, J. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.01.014 · Cited by 473
Shiferaw, B. A., Okello, J., & Reddy, R. V. (2009) · Environment, Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-007-9132-1 · Cited by 338
Giger, M., Liniger, H., Sauter, C., & Schwilch, G. (2018) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.2429 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Pender, J.
- Venue
- Agricultural Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-09-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 113-125
- ISSN
- 0169-5150 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028282919
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of farmers' indigenous soil and water conservation investments in semi-arid India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0169-5150(98)00026-7
- The paper
- Pender, J. (1998). Determinants of farmers' indigenous soil and water conservation investments in semi-arid India. Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5150(98)00026-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.