The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adoption of soil conservation: the case of the Philippine uplands
Open accessAbstract
Soil degradation in the sloping uplands of Asia is a serious problem that threatens the sustainability of agriculture. Although several soil conservation technologies have been developed and promoted, their adoption has not been widespread. A micro-economic analysis of adoption of contour hedgerows by upland farmers in the Philippines is conducted to identify the factors that determine adoption. The empirical results show that adoption depends on several farm and farmer characteristics and the relative importance of these factors differs across sites. The high cost of establishment, maintenance and the loss of land to hedgerows are considered to be the major constraints to adoption by non-adopters. The economics of the contour hedgerow system is found to improve substantially if crop intensification or cash cropping is possible. In addition to the need to develop a range of cost-effective technologies, the study indicates that in the more marginal environments, on-site benefits alone may not be sufficient to justify investment in soil conservation. ©1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey
Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985) · Economic Development and Cultural Change · doi:10.1086/451461 · Cited by 3,482
Cited by
Hassan, R., Nhemachena, C., Hassan, R. M., & Nhemachena, C. (2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.56969 · Cited by 745
Doss, C. R. (2006) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1574-0864.2006.00119.x · Cited by 506
Amsalu, A., & de Graaff, J. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.01.014 · Cited by 473
Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics
(2026) · Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics · doi:10.5897/jdae · Cited by 465
Technology Adoption under Production Uncertainty: Theory and Application to Irrigation Technology
Koundouri, P., Nauges, C., & Tzouvelekas, V. (2006) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00886.x · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- Lapar, M.
- Venue
- Agricultural Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-256
- ISSN
- 0169-5150 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039173794
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adoption of soil conservation: the case of the Philippine uplands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0169-5150(99)00028-6
- The paper
- Lapar, M. (1999). Adoption of soil conservation: the case of the Philippine uplands. Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5150(99)00028-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.