The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution
Abstract
The growing number of empirical studies performed in ecology and evolution creates a need for quantitative summaries of research domains to generate higher-order conclusions about general trends and patterns. Recent developments In meta-analysis (the area of statistics that is designed for summarizing and analyzing multiple independent studies) have opened up new and exciting possibilities. Unlike more traditional qualitative and narrative reviews, meta-analysis allows powerful quantitative analyses of the magnitude of effects and has a high degree of objectivity because it is based on a standardized set of statistical procedures. The first pioneering applications in ecology and evolution demonstrate that meta-analysis is both tractable and powerful.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Open science practices have been strongly advocated particularly in the past few years to facilitate full access to scientific data, particularly in an unbiased manner 79 .”
From Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018) · cites this paper as [79]
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942661 · Cited by 8,377
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984) · Cited by 3,925
Meta-analysis in social research
(1982) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(82)90011-8 · Cited by 3,896
Community structure, population control, and competition.
Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E., & Slobodkin, L. B. (1960) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282146 · Cited by 3,492
The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-4983 · Cited by 3,417
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Selden, 1992, Curr Bibliogr Med., 1992/13
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704
Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists
Nakagawa, S., & Cuthill, I. C. (2007) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00027.x · Cited by 3,835
GCTE-NEWS, Rustad, L. E., Campbell, J. L., Marion, G. M., Norby, R. J., Mitchell, M. J., Hartley, A. E., Cornelissen, J. H. C., & Gurevitch, J. (2001) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420000544 · Cited by 2,187
The Strength of Phenotypic Selection in Natural Populations
Kingsolver, J. G., Hoekstra, H. E., Hoekstra, J. M., Berrigan, D. A., VIGNIERI, S. N., Hill, C. E., Hoang, A., Gibert, P., & Beerli, P. (2001) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/319193 · Cited by 1,843
The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta‐analysis
BENGTSSON, J., AHNSTRÖM, J., & WEIBULL, A. (2005) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01005.x · Cited by 1,751
Metadata
- Authors
- Arnqvist, G., & Wooster, D.
- Affiliations
- University of New Mexico (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Venue
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 236-240
- ISSN
- 0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162582079
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Keywords
- meta-analysis, ecology, evolution, effect size, research trends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
