Cited by 28Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchPersonality Traits and PsychologySleep and related disorders

Dream recall frequency and openness to experience: a negative finding

Schredl, Michael·2002·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00013-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schredl, M.
Affiliations
Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
Corresponding author
Schredl, Michael
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-12
Volume
33
Issue
8
Pages
1285-1289
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084072273
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
dream recall frequency, openness to experience, Big Five personality traits, personality traits, absorption, hypnotic susceptibility, individual differences, visual memory, sleep behavior, creativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review