Cited by 152Higher Education Research StudiesEducational Outcomes and InfluencesEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The effects of social anxiety and social skills on academic performance

Strahan, Esther Y·2003·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00049-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 152

Authors
Strahan, E. Y.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Strahan, Esther Y
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-02
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
347-366
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089156003
Cited by
152
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
social anxiety, social skills, academic performance, grade point average, academic persistence, university students, emotional control, emotional suppression, college adjustment, institutional commitment, high school class rank, gender differences, ethnicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review