Does the test of self-conscious affect (TOSCA) measure maladaptive aspects of guilt and adaptive aspects of shame? An empirical investigation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research indicates higher detachment correlates with lower shame and with higher resilience.
“Given research indicating higher detachment correlates with lower shame and with higher resilience (Luyten et al., 2002; Uji et al., 2011), these increases suggest a positive therapeutic impact.”
From Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of compassion-focused acceptance and commitment therapy delivered via telehealth in a community behavioral health clinic (2025) · cites this paper as Luyten et al., 2002
The TOSCA-3 Guilt-Proneness scale measures mild or adaptive forms of guilt and has been shown to correlate positively with empathy, which is promoted in CFACT as an attribute of compassion.
“It should be noted that the TOSCA-3 Guilt-Proneness scale measures mild or adaptive forms of guilt and has been shown to correlate positively with empathy (Luyten et al., 2002), which is promoted in CFACT as an attribute of compassion.”
From Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of compassion-focused acceptance and commitment therapy delivered via telehealth in a community behavioral health clinic (2025) · cites this paper as Luyten et al., 2002
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 75 · Cited by 154
- Authors
- Luyten, P., Fontaine, J. R. J., & Corveleyn, J.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Luyten, Patrick
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1373-1387
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109322601
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
- Keywords
- guilt, shame, self-conscious emotions, low self-esteem, scale interpretation, interpersonal functioning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
