Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: do they matter?
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The RADAR-base active RMT app administered validated measurements of depression and self-esteem every 2 weeks via the PHQ8 and RSES.
“The RADAR-base active RMT (aRMT) app administered validated measurements of depression and self-esteem every 2-weeks via the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ8; [25] and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES; 26).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 380
- Authors
- Greenberger, E., Chen, C., Dmitrieva, J., & Farruggia, S. P.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Greenberger, Ellen
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1241-1254
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025035863
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- escholarship.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, item wording, scale dimensionality, self-image, factor structure, self-deception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
