Affect intensity and frequency: their relation to mean level and variability of positive and negative affect and Eysencks personality traits
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most studies of intra-individual emotion variability fail to consider gender or attempt to statistically control for it.
“most studies of intra-individual emotion variability simply fail to consider gender or attempt to statistically “control” for it20–28.”
From Little evidence for sex or ovarian hormone influences on affective variability (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Kardum, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Rijeka (HR)
- Corresponding author
- Kardum, Igor
- ORCID
- Kardum, Igor
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-47
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993224026
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Keywords
- affect intensity, positive affect, negative affect, affect variability, Eysenck personality traits, psychoticism, neuroticism, temperament, emotion measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
