Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: Implications for cochlear implantation

NADOLJR, J·1997·Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Abstract

Although the identity of all the variables that may influence speech recognition after cochlear implantation is unknown, the degree of preservation of spiral ganglion cells is generally considered to be of primary importance. A series of experiments in our laboratories, directed at quantification of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the profoundly deaf, evaluation of the predictive value of a variety of clinical parameters, and the evaluation of the consequences of implantation in the inner ear, is summarized. Histologic study of the inner ears of patients who were deafened during life demonstrated that the cause of deafness accounted for 57% of the variability of spiral ganglion cell counts. Spiral ganglion cell counts were highest in individuals deafened by aminoglycoside toxicity or sudden idiopathic deafness and lowest in those deafened by postnatal viral labyrinthitis, congenital or genetic deafness, or bacterial meningitis. Study of the determinants of degeneration of the spiral ganglion revealed that degeneration is most severe in the basal compared with the apical turn and more severe when both inner and outer hair cells are absent. Unlike the findings in some experimental animal studies, no survival advantage of type II ganglion cells could be identified. There was a strong negative correlation between the degree of bony occlusion of the cochlea and the normality of the spiral ganglion cell count. However, even in specimens in which there was severe bony occlusion, significant numbers of spiral ganglion cells survived. A strong positive correlation between the diameter of the cochlear, vestibular, and eighth cranial nerves with the total spiral ganglion cell count (p < 0.001) was found. This would suggest that modern imaging techniques may be used to predict residual spiral ganglion cell population in cochlear implant candidates. Trauma from implantation of the electrode array was studied in both cadaveric human temporal bone models and temporal bones from individuals who received implants during life. A characteristic pattern of damage to the lateral cochlear wall and basilar membrane was identified in the upper basal turn. New bone formation and perielectrode fibrosis was common after cochlear implantation. Despite this significant trauma and reaction, there is no firm evidence that further degeneration of the spiral ganglion can be predicted as a consequence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0194-5998(97)70178-5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 359

Metadata

Authors
NADOLJR, J.
Venue
Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-09
Volume
117
Issue
3
Pages
220-228
ISSN
  • 0161-6439 (ISSN-L)
  • 0194-5998
OpenAlex
W1518396485
Cited by
359
References
0
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: Implications for cochlear implantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0194-5998(97)70178-5
The paper
NADOLJR, J. (1997). Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: Implications for cochlear implantation. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0194-5998(97)70178-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.