Cited by 111Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac Health and Mental Health

Sotalol testing unmasks altered repolarization in patients with suspected acquired long-QT-syndrome-a case-control pilot study using i.v. sotalol

KAAB, S·2003·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate provocative sotalol testing to unmask abnormal repolarization due to altered myocardial electrical properties as the key feature in acquired Long-QT-Syndrome. Reliable diagnosis and risk stratification for the individual patient are complicated by the multitude of mechanisms involved in acquired QT-prolongation. The combined influence of all components determines susceptibility to arrhythmias related to QT-prolongation. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients who had experienced torsades de pointes in association with QT-prolonging drugs were tested with i.v. D,L-sotalol (2mg/kg) with 24-h intensive care monitoring to evaluate the repolarization process by determining QT- and QTc-prolongations. Results were compared to age and sex matched controls. RESULTS: At baseline, no differences between control and study population with regard to QT and QTc were detected. After sotalol infusion, QTc increased from 422+/-17 to 450+/-22ms in controls and from 434+/-20 to 541+/-37ms in the study population. Torsades de pointes occurred in three out of 20 patients (15%) in the study population but in none of the control patients following i.v. sotalol testing. CONCLUSIONS: Controlled exposure to sotalol successfully identifies patients with normal QTc intervals but altered myocardial repolarization. This may be useful for clarifying diagnosis and pathogenesis of acquired Long-QT-Syndrome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00806-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Monitoring PR, QT, and QRS durations during initiation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy can identify patients at higher risk of drug-induced proarrhythmia on longer-term treatment.

    “monitoring PR, QT, and QRS durations during initiation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy can identify patients at higher risk of drug-induced proarrhythmia on longer-term treatment.[669][670][671]”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 111

Authors
KAAB, S.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2003-04
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
649-657
ISSN
0195-668X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169811683
Cited by
111
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
acquired long QT syndrome, myocardial repolarization, QT prolongation, torsades de pointes, QTc interval, QT-prolonging drugs, arrhythmic risk stratification, drug-induced QT prolongation
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Adult, Aged, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Long QT Syndrome, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Sotalol, Case-Control Studies, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review