Sotalol testing unmasks altered repolarization in patients with suspected acquired long-QT-syndrome-a case-control pilot study using i.v. sotalol
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate provocative sotalol testing to unmask abnormal repolarization due to altered myocardial electrical properties as the key feature in acquired Long-QT-Syndrome. Reliable diagnosis and risk stratification for the individual patient are complicated by the multitude of mechanisms involved in acquired QT-prolongation. The combined influence of all components determines susceptibility to arrhythmias related to QT-prolongation. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients who had experienced torsades de pointes in association with QT-prolonging drugs were tested with i.v. D,L-sotalol (2mg/kg) with 24-h intensive care monitoring to evaluate the repolarization process by determining QT- and QTc-prolongations. Results were compared to age and sex matched controls. RESULTS: At baseline, no differences between control and study population with regard to QT and QTc were detected. After sotalol infusion, QTc increased from 422+/-17 to 450+/-22ms in controls and from 434+/-20 to 541+/-37ms in the study population. Torsades de pointes occurred in three out of 20 patients (15%) in the study population but in none of the control patients following i.v. sotalol testing. CONCLUSIONS: Controlled exposure to sotalol successfully identifies patients with normal QTc intervals but altered myocardial repolarization. This may be useful for clarifying diagnosis and pathogenesis of acquired Long-QT-Syndrome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Monitoring PR, QT, and QRS durations during initiation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy can identify patients at higher risk of drug-induced proarrhythmia on longer-term treatment.
“monitoring PR, QT, and QRS durations during initiation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy can identify patients at higher risk of drug-induced proarrhythmia on longer-term treatment.[669][670][671]”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [669]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 111
- Authors
- KAAB, S.
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 649-657
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169811683
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Keywords
- acquired long QT syndrome, myocardial repolarization, QT prolongation, torsades de pointes, QTc interval, QT-prolonging drugs, arrhythmic risk stratification, drug-induced QT prolongation
- MeSH terms
- Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Adult, Aged, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Long QT Syndrome, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Sotalol, Case-Control Studies, Statistics, Nonparametric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review