Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 513

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Management of Grown Up Congenital Heart Disease

Deanfield, J·2003·European Heart Journal

Abstract

This report is intended to promote collaboration between the various professional groups involved in the care of adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease, administrators and those who provide resources for health care. Sustained effort to implement the recommendations of this Task Force will be required in order to bring to full fruition the huge successes achieved in the treatment of congenital heart disease in children over the last three decades. The participants humbly acknowledge the many unresolved issues and uncertainties of grown-up congenital heart disease and are all involved in efforts to improve care for this challenging and rewarding group of patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00131-3

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 513

Metadata

Authors
Deanfield, J.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2003-06
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
1035-1084
ISSN
0195-668X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120718281
Cited by
513
References
0
FWCI
19.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of Grown Up Congenital Heart Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00131-3
The paper
Deanfield, J. (2003). Management of Grown Up Congenital Heart Disease. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00131-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.