Cited by 13Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyHealth, psychology, and well-beingAging and Gerontology Research

Helping older adults find serenity

Roberts, Kay T., Messenger, Theresa C.·1993·Geriatric Nursing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0197-4572(06)80059-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The Brief Serenity Scale

    Kreitzer, M. J., Gross, C. R., Waleekhachonloet, O.-A., Reilly-Spong, M., & Byrd, M. (2009) · Journal of Holistic Nursing · doi:10.1177/0898010108327212 · Cited by 70 · see citing works

    “Using the 65-item version of the Serenity Scale, Roberts and Aspy (1993) conducted two intervention studies (Messenger & Roberts, 1994; Roberts & Messenger, 1993) and a factor analysis (Roberts & Aspy, 1993).”
    BackgroundMethod

Authors
Roberts, K. T., & Messenger, T. C.
Venue
Geriatric Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-11
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
317-322
ISSN
0197-4572 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091261354
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geriatric Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
tranquility, older adults, nursing interventions, coping, chronic disease, spirituality, interiority, late-life development, quality of life, nursing practice, consumer perception
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Attitude, Geriatric Nursing, Humans, Nursing Assessment, Patient Care Planning, Personal Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review