Cited by 131Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

FAD mutant PS-1 gene-targeted mice: increased Aβ42 and Aβ deposition without APP overproduction

Flood, D·2002·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

To investigate the consequences of mutant presenilin-1 (PS-1) expression under the control of the normal PS-1 gene, a gene-targeted mouse bearing the FAD mutation P264L was made. Gene-targeted models are distinct from transgenic models because the mutant gene is expressed at normal levels, in the absence of the wild-type protein. PS-1(P264L/P264L) mice had normal expression of PS-1 mRNA, but levels of the N- and C-terminal protein fragments of PS-1 were reduced while levels of the holoprotein were increased. When crossed into Tg(HuAPP695.K670N/M671L)2576 mice, the PS-1(P264L) mutation accelerated the onset of amyloid (Abeta) deposition in a gene-dosage dependent manner. Tg2576/PS-1(P264L/P264L) mice also had Abeta deposition that was widely distributed throughout the brain and spinal cord. APP(NLh/NLh)/PS-1(P264L/P264L) double gene-targeted mice had elevated levels of Abeta42, sufficient to cause Abeta deposition beginning at 6 months of age. Abeta deposition increased linearly over time in APP(NLh/NLh)/PS-1(P264L/P264L) mice, whereas the increase in Tg2576 mice was exponential. The APP(NLh/NLh)/PS-1(P264L/P264L) double gene-targeted mouse represents an animal model that exhibits Abeta deposition without overexpression of APP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0197-4580(01)00330-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 131

Authors
Flood, D.
Corresponding author
Flood, D
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-06
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
335-348
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133549393
Cited by
131
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
presenilin 1, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta deposition, amyloid-beta 42, APP overexpression, gene-targeted mice, Tg2576 mice, gene dosage, animal models of Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Cell Line, Female, Genotype, Humans, Membrane Proteins, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Mutant Strains, Mice, Transgenic, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Peptide Fragments, Pregnancy, RNA, Messenger, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Gene Targeting, Neocortex, Amino Acid Substitution, Mice, Presenilin-1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review