Trastornos funcionales y motores digestivos
Abstract
This article discusses the most interesting presentations at Digestive Disease Week, held in San Diego, in the field of functional and motor gastrointestinal disorders. One of the most important contributions was undoubtedly the presentation of the new Rome IV diagnostic criteria for functional gastrointestinal disorders. We therefore devote some space in this article to explaining these new criteria in the most common functional disorders. In fact, there has already been discussion of data comparing Rome IV and Rome III criteria in the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome, confirming that the new criteria are somewhat more restrictive. From the physiopathological point of view, several studies have shown that the aggregation of physiopathological alterations increases symptom severity in distinct functional disorders. From the therapeutic point of view, more data were presented on the efficacy of acotiamide and its mechanisms of action in functional dyspepsia, the safety and efficacy of domperidone in patients with gastroparesis, and the efficacy of linaclotide both in irritable bowel syndrome and constipation. In irritable bowel syndrome, more data have come to light on the favourable results of a low FODMAP diet, with emphasis on its role in modifying the microbiota. Finally, long-term efficacy data were presented on the distinct treatment options in achalasia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals with GI motility problems commonly complain of constipation, irrespective of any changes in stool frequency or colon transit time.
“Individuals with GI motility problems commonly complain of constipation. This happens irrespective of any changes in stool frequency or colon transit time (Mearin et al., 2016).”
From Thyroid disorders and gastrointestinal dysmotility: an old association (2024) · cites this paper as Mearin et al., 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thyroid disorders and gastrointestinal dysmotility: an old association
Xu, G.-M., Hu, M.-X., Li, S.-Y., Ran, X., Zhang, H., & Ding, X.-F. (2024) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2024.1389113 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mearin, F., Rey, E., & Balboa, A.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Quirón Teknon (ES)
- Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Mearin, Fermín
- Venue
- Gastroenterología y Hepatología
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 39
- Pages
- 3-13
- ISSN
- 0210-5705 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4237926884
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gastroenterología y Hepatología (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Keywords
- functional gastrointestinal disorders, Rome IV criteria, irritable bowel syndrome, functional dyspepsia, gastroparesis, constipation, acotiamide, domperidone, linaclotide, FODMAP diet, gut microbiota, gastrointestinal motility disorders, symptom severity, long-term treatment outcomes, treatment efficacy and safety, Digestive Disease Week
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review