Cited by 10Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsGut microbiota and health

Trastornos funcionales y motores digestivos

Mearin, Fermín, Rey, Enrique, Balboa, Agustín·2016·Gastroenterología y Hepatología

Abstract

This article discusses the most interesting presentations at Digestive Disease Week, held in San Diego, in the field of functional and motor gastrointestinal disorders. One of the most important contributions was undoubtedly the presentation of the new Rome IV diagnostic criteria for functional gastrointestinal disorders. We therefore devote some space in this article to explaining these new criteria in the most common functional disorders. In fact, there has already been discussion of data comparing Rome IV and Rome III criteria in the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome, confirming that the new criteria are somewhat more restrictive. From the physiopathological point of view, several studies have shown that the aggregation of physiopathological alterations increases symptom severity in distinct functional disorders. From the therapeutic point of view, more data were presented on the efficacy of acotiamide and its mechanisms of action in functional dyspepsia, the safety and efficacy of domperidone in patients with gastroparesis, and the efficacy of linaclotide both in irritable bowel syndrome and constipation. In irritable bowel syndrome, more data have come to light on the favourable results of a low FODMAP diet, with emphasis on its role in modifying the microbiota. Finally, long-term efficacy data were presented on the distinct treatment options in achalasia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0210-5705(16)30169-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with GI motility problems commonly complain of constipation, irrespective of any changes in stool frequency or colon transit time.

    “Individuals with GI motility problems commonly complain of constipation. This happens irrespective of any changes in stool frequency or colon transit time (Mearin et al., 2016).”

    From Thyroid disorders and gastrointestinal dysmotility: an old association (2024) · cites this paper as Mearin et al., 2016

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mearin, F., Rey, E., & Balboa, A.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Quirón Teknon (ES)
  • Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES)
Corresponding author
Mearin, Fermín
Venue
Gastroenterología y Hepatología
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
39
Pages
3-13
ISSN
0210-5705 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4237926884
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
closed
Locations
Gastroenterología y Hepatología (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
functional gastrointestinal disorders, Rome IV criteria, irritable bowel syndrome, functional dyspepsia, gastroparesis, constipation, acotiamide, domperidone, linaclotide, FODMAP diet, gut microbiota, gastrointestinal motility disorders, symptom severity, long-term treatment outcomes, treatment efficacy and safety, Digestive Disease Week

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review