Cited by 115Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMedication Adherence and ComplianceBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Eficacia de una intervención informativa a hipertensos mediante mensajes de alerta en el teléfono móvil (HTA-ALERT)

Open access
Márquez Contreras, E., de la Figuera von Wichmann, M., Gil Guillén, V., Ylla-Catalá, A., Figueras, M., Balaña, M., Naval, J.·2004·Atención Primaria

Abstract

Objective To analyze the effect of an intervention to provide information with mobile phone text messages to patients with hypertension on compliance with therapy for hypertension.Design Comparative, controlled, multicenter, randomized cluster study.Setting 26 primary care health centers in Spain.Participants 26 researchers were randomized to a control group or an intervention group (52 patients each, for a total of 104 patients). All patients were receiving monotherapy for uncontrolled hypertension.Intervention Patients in the control group received their physician's usual interventions. Patients in the intervention group received messages and reminders sent to their mobile phones 2 days per week during 4 months.Main outcome measures Tablets were counted and blood pressure was measured at the start of the study and 1, 3, and 6 months later. The percentage of compliers, mean percentage of compliance and degree of control of hypertension were compared. The reduction in absolute and relative risk was calculated, as was the number of individuals needed to treat to avoid noncompliance.Results The results were evaluated for a total of 67 individuals (34 in the intervention group and 33 in the control group). The rate of compliance was 85.1% (CI, 74.9%-95.3%) overall, 85.7% (CI, 70.5%-100.9%) in the control group and 84.4% in the intervention group (CI, 70.7%-95.3%) (P=NS). Mean percentage compliance was 90.2%+/-16.3% overall, 88.1%+/-20.8% in the control group and 91.9%+/-11.6% in the intervention group (P=NS). The percentage of patients whose hypertension was controlled at the end of the study was 51.5% (CI, 34.4%-68.6%) in the control group and 64.7% (CI, 48.6%-80.8%) in the intervention group (P=NS).Conclusions The telephone messaging intervention with alerts and reminders sent to mobile phones did not improve compliance with therapy in patients with hypertension.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0212-6567(04)78922-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 115

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Márquez Contreras E, Casado Martínez JJ, Márquez Cabeza JJ. Estrategias para mejorar el cumplimiento. FMC 2001;8:558-73.
  2. Haynes RB, Wang E, Da Mota Gomes M. A critical review of interventions for improve adherence with prescriber medica- tions. Patient Educ Consel 1987;10:155-66.
  3. Márquez Contreras E, Casado Martínez JJ, López de Andrés M, Corés Prieto E, López Zamorano JM, Moreno García JP, et al. Cumplimiento terapéutico de las dislipemias. Ensayo sobre la eficacia de la educación sanitaria. Aten Primaria 1998;22:79-84.
  4. Márquez Contreras E, Casado Martínez JJ, Gil Guillén V, De la Figuera M, Martell N. Prevalencia del incumplimiento terapéu- tico en España, entre los años 1984-2001. Hipertensión 2002;19:12-6.
  5. Pertusa Martínez S, Quirce Andrés F, Saavedra Llobregat MD, Merino Sánchez J. Evaluación de 3 estrategias para mejorar el cumplimiento terapéutico de pacientes con hipertensión arterial esencial. Aten Primaria 1998;22:670-1.

Authors
Márquez Contreras, E., de la Figuera von Wichmann, M., Gil Guillén, V., Ylla-Catalá, A., Figueras, M., Balaña, M., & Naval, J.
Affiliations
Novartis (Spain) (ES)
Venue
Atención Primaria
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
399-405
ISSN
0212-6567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114753586
Cited by
115
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Atención Primaria (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
hypertension, mobile phone alerts, text messaging intervention, medication adherence, antihypertensive therapy, blood pressure control, primary care, uncontrolled hypertension, monotherapy, intervention efficacy, number needed to harm, risk mitigation, patient education, health behavior change, South America, Africa, Asia
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Pressure Determination, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Prospective Studies, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review