The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SURGICAL SITE INFECTION IN CLEAN AND CLEAN-CONTAMINATED CASES
Open accessAbstract
The rate of surgical site infections and the frequency of various pathogens causing surgical site infection with their antibiotic resistance pattern in general surgery units were studied. In the period from May 2001 to July 2002, 190 patients admitted for surgery (clean and clean-contaminated elective cases) were assessed preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively. Normal microbial flora was studied within 24 to 48 hours of admission and patients were followed up to 30 days postoperatively. Infected wounds were studied bacteriologically and clinically. The overall infection rate was 8.95%. Surgical site infection rate was 3.03% in clean surgeries and 22.41% in clean-contaminated surgeries. Significant increase was seen in surgical site infection rate with an increase in preoperative stay. The increase in duration of surgery was associated with a significant rise in the rate of surgical site infection. Surgical site infection rate was much higher (22.41%) in cases where a drain was used than in non-drained wounds (3.03%). The most common isolate was Staphylococcus aureus followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Lilani et al. noted a substantial rise in the incidence of SSIs with a preoperative stay longer than two days.”
From Insights Into Laparoscopic Port Site Complications: A Comprehensive Review (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“A substantial rise in SSIs was observed for surgeries lasting two hours or more [14].”
From Insights Into Laparoscopic Port Site Complications: A Comprehensive Review (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Additionally, he stated that there was no infection rate in surgeries lasting less than 30 minutes.”
From Insights Into Laparoscopic Port Site Complications: A Comprehensive Review (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999
Mangram, A. J., Horan, T. C., Pearson, M. L., Silver, L. C., & Jarvis, W. R. (1999) · Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/501620 · Cited by 4,587
Koneman's Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology
Winn, C. W. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,999
The Epidemiology of Wound Infection: A 10-Year Prospective Study of 62,939 Wounds
Cruse, P. J. E., & Foord, R. (1980) · Surgical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0039-6109(16)42031-1 · Cited by 1,394
Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology.
(1984) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-101-2-288_2 · Cited by 1,357
Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Drainage, Technical and Physiological Considerations
Roe, B. B. (1964) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-196407000-00001 · Cited by 553
Continuous, 10-Year Wound Infection Surveillance
Olson, M. M. (1990) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410180120020 · Cited by 265
Nichols, R. L. (1991) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(91)90344-w · Cited by 170
Surgical Considerations of Endogenous Infections — Sources, Types, and Methods of Control
Altemeier, W. A., Culbertson, W. R., & Hummel, R. P. (1968) · Surgical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0039-6109(16)38448-1 · Cited by 170
Postoperative wound infections
Yalçin, A. N., Bakır, M., Bakıcı, M. Z., Dökmetaş, İ., & Sabir, N. (1995) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/0195-6701(95)90278-3 · Cited by 95
Microbiology in Clinical Practice
(1989) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-06493-6 · Cited by 74
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Berard, 1964, Postoperative wound infections: The influence of ultraviolet irradiation of the operating room and of various other factors, Ann Surg, 160, 1
- Agarwal, 1972, Study of postoperative wound infection, Indian J Surg, 34, 314
- Tripathy, 1984, Post-operative wound sepsis, Indian J Surg, 47, 285
- Kowli, 1985, Hospital infection, Indian J Surg, 48, 475
- Anvikar, 1999, A one year prospective study of 3,280 surgical wounds, Indian J Med Microbiol, 17, 129
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection
Webster, J., & Alghamdi, A. A. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006353.pub4 · Cited by 279
Prevalence of Surgical Site Infection in Orthopedic Surgery: A 5-year Analysis
Mulhim, F. A. A., Baragbah, M. A., Sadat‐Ali, M., Al-Omran, A. S., & Azam, M. Q. (2014) · International Surgery · doi:10.9738/intsurg-d-13-00251.1 · Cited by 166
Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection
Webster, J., & Alghamdi, A. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006353.pub2 · Cited by 154
Negi, V. (2015) · JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH · doi:10.7860/jcdr/2015/15342.6698 · Cited by 136
Mulu, W., Kibru, G., Beyene, G., & Damtie, M. (2012) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Lilani, S., Jangale, N., Chowdhary, A., & Daver, G.
- Affiliations
- Grant Medical College and Sir Jamshedjee Jeejeebhoy Group of Hospitals (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Lilani, SP
- ORCID
- Chowdhary, A
- Venue
- Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 249-252
- ISSN
- 0255-0857 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1532541072
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
- Keywords
- surgical site infection, clean surgery, clean-contaminated surgery, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, antibiotic resistance, wound drains, duration of surgery, general surgery, postoperative infection rates
- MeSH terms
- Bacteria, Cross Infection, Humans, Population Surveillance, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Surgical Wound Infection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review