The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving quality inspection of food products by computer vision––a review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Colour Measurement and Analysis in Fresh and Processed Foods: A Review
Pathare, P. B., Opara, U. L., & Al-Said, F. A.-J. (2013) · Food and Bioprocess Technology · doi:10.1007/s11947-012-0867-9 · Cited by 2,368
Color measurement in L∗a∗b∗ units from RGB digital images
León, K., Mery, D., Pedreschi, F., & León, J. (2006) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2006.03.006 · Cited by 874
Barrett, D. M., Beaulieu, J. C., & Shewfelt, R. (2010) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408391003626322 · Cited by 874
Meat quality assessment using biophysical methods related to meat structure
Damez, J.-L., & Clerjon, S. (2008) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.039 · Cited by 280
Computer vision for real-time extrusion quality monitoring and control in robotic construction
Kazemian, A., Yuan, X., Davtalab, O., & Khoshnevis, B. (2019) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.022 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Brosnan, T., & Sun, D.-W.
- Venue
- Journal of Food Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-16
- ISSN
- 0260-8774 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145106362
- Cited by
- 1,011
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving quality inspection of food products by computer vision––a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0260-8774(03)00183-3
- The paper
- Brosnan, T., & Sun, D.-W. (2004). Improving quality inspection of food products by computer vision––a review. Journal of Food Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0260-8774(03)00183-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
