The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Space weather: worse than hurricane Katrina
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Also, power restoration may become difficult and lengthy if major system components are damaged requiring their replacement [9,153,160].”
From Energy system resilience – A review (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“Power shortage for even a few days could paralyze critical services like water supply, food refrigeration and distribution, health care (after the fuel in backup generators run out) [9,153,155,161], and longer-term shortages could even affect food production [162].”
From Energy system resilience – A review (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Severe Space Weather Events – Understanding Societal and Economic Impacts (National Academies Press)
Cited by
Energy system resilience – A review
Jasiūnas, J., Lund, P. D., & Mikkola, J. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111476 · Cited by 412
“Also, power restoration may become difficult and lengthy if major system components are damaged requiring their replacement [9,153,160].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Brooks, M.
- Corresponding author
- Brooks, Michael
- Venue
- New Scientist
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 201
- Issue
- 2700
- Pages
- 31-35
- ISSN
- 0262-4079 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043776726
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- The New Scientist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Keywords
- space weather, geomagnetic storms, solar storms, power system disturbances
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Space weather: worse than hurricane Katrina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0262-4079(09)60799-5
- The paper
- Brooks, M. (2009). Space weather: worse than hurricane Katrina. New Scientist. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0262-4079(09)60799-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
