Cited by 22Animal Disease Management and Epidemiologyvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesMicrobial infections and disease research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Protection of swine from foot-and-mouth disease with one dose of an all-D retro peptide

Nargi, F·1999·Vaccine

Abstract

Nine pigs were given a single inoculum of 100 microg of the all-D retro peptide corresponding to the immunodominant GH loop encompassing residues 141-159 of capsid protein VP1 of foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype A, sub-type 12. The peptide was conjugated to activated keyhole limpet haemocyanin and oil-adjuvanted before inoculation. The animals were challenged eleven weeks post-vaccination by exposing them to a pig which had been infected with the virus by inoculation. Two naive animals were included in the challenge study as controls. One of the vaccinated animals was completely unprotected and two developed very small lesions. None of the six remaining animals exhibited any clinical signs but two developed antibodies against nonstructural proteins indicating that replication of the virus had occurred. No evidence of replication could be detected in the remaining four animals, either by rise in neutralizing antibody titre or by production of antibodies against non-structural proteins specific for virus replication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0264-410x(99)00127-9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 22

Metadata

Authors
Nargi, F.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Nargi, F
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-07-16
Volume
17
Issue
22
Pages
2888-2893
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014304895
Cited by
22
References
9
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
Keywords
foot-and-mouth disease, foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype A, peptide vaccine, VP1 capsid protein, keyhole limpet hemocyanin conjugation, oil adjuvant, single-dose vaccination, pigs, challenge protection, neutralizing antibodies
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Viral, Capsid, Female, Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Aphthovirus, Neutralization Tests, Peptides, Precipitin Tests, Swine, Swine Diseases, Viral Vaccines, Virion, Viral Nonstructural Proteins, Capsid Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protection of swine from foot-and-mouth disease with one dose of an all-D retro peptide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0264-410x(99)00127-9
The paper
Nargi, F. (1999). Protection of swine from foot-and-mouth disease with one dose of an all-D retro peptide. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0264-410x(99)00127-9