Patellofemoral joint kinetics during squatting in collegiate women athletes
Abstract
Objective To characterize the biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint during squatting in collegiate women athletes.Design Repeated measures experimental design.Background Although squatting exercises are required components of most intercollegiate resistance-training programs and are commonly performed during rehabilitation, the effects of various squatting depths on patellofemoral joint stress have not been quantified.Methods Anthropometric data, three-dimensional knee kinematics, and ground reaction forces were used to calculate the knee extensor moment (inverse dynamics approach) in five intercollegiate female athletes during squatting exercise at three different depths (approximately 70 degrees, 90 degrees and 110 degrees of knee flexion). A biomechanical model of the patellofemoral joint was used to quantify the patellofemoral joint reaction force and patellofemoral joint stress during each trial.Results Peak knee extensor moment, patellofemoral joint reaction force and patellofemoral joint stress did not vary significantly between the three squatting trials.Conclusions Squatting from 70 degrees to 110 degrees of knee flexion had little effect on patellofemoral joint kinetics. The relative constancy of the patellofemoral joint reaction force and joint stress appeared to be related to a consistent knee extensor moment produced across the three squatting depths.Relevance The results of this study do not support the premise that squatting to 110 degrees places greater stress on the patellofemoral joint than squatting to 70 degrees. These findings may have implications with respect to the safe design of athletic training regimens and rehabilitation programs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The impact of stance width on the sagittal plane is conflicting.
“In terms of the sagittal plane, however, the impact of stance width is conflicting.25–27”
From A Biomechanical Review of the Squat Exercise: Implications for Clinical Practice. (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
The hip flexion moment during wide stance squatting has been reported to be higher (10%-48%) or not different compared to narrow/medium stance squatting.
“Similarly, the hip flexion moment during wide stance squatting has been reported to be higher (10%-48%)26,27 or not different compared to narrow/medium stance squatting.25”
From A Biomechanical Review of the Squat Exercise: Implications for Clinical Practice. (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
Compared to a narrow/medium stance, the knee flexion moment during wide stance squatting has been reported to be higher (69%-80%), lower (11%), or not different.
“Compared to a narrow/medium stance, the knee flexion moment during wide stance squatting has been reported to be higher (69%-80%),27 lower (11%),25 or not different.26”
From A Biomechanical Review of the Squat Exercise: Implications for Clinical Practice. (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
Increased gluteus maximus activation can be achieved through the use of wider stance squats, as well as external band resistance around the thighs.
“Increased gluteus maximus activation can be achieved through the use of wider stance squats,26–29 as well as external band resistance around the thighs.45,46”
From A Biomechanical Review of the Squat Exercise: Implications for Clinical Practice. (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Salem, G. J., & Powers, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Salem, George J.
- Venue
- Clinical Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 424-430
- ISSN
- 0268-0033 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059383600
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Keywords
- patellofemoral joint, squatting, squat depth, knee extensor moment, patellofemoral joint stress, knee kinematics, ground reaction force, female athletes, resistance training, knee flexion
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Humans, Knee Joint, Exercise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review