Cited by 85Lower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesSports Performance and Training

Patellofemoral joint kinetics during squatting in collegiate women athletes

Salem, George J., Powers, Christopher M.·2001·Clinical Biomechanics

Abstract

Objective To characterize the biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint during squatting in collegiate women athletes.Design Repeated measures experimental design.Background Although squatting exercises are required components of most intercollegiate resistance-training programs and are commonly performed during rehabilitation, the effects of various squatting depths on patellofemoral joint stress have not been quantified.Methods Anthropometric data, three-dimensional knee kinematics, and ground reaction forces were used to calculate the knee extensor moment (inverse dynamics approach) in five intercollegiate female athletes during squatting exercise at three different depths (approximately 70 degrees, 90 degrees and 110 degrees of knee flexion). A biomechanical model of the patellofemoral joint was used to quantify the patellofemoral joint reaction force and patellofemoral joint stress during each trial.Results Peak knee extensor moment, patellofemoral joint reaction force and patellofemoral joint stress did not vary significantly between the three squatting trials.Conclusions Squatting from 70 degrees to 110 degrees of knee flexion had little effect on patellofemoral joint kinetics. The relative constancy of the patellofemoral joint reaction force and joint stress appeared to be related to a consistent knee extensor moment produced across the three squatting depths.Relevance The results of this study do not support the premise that squatting to 110 degrees places greater stress on the patellofemoral joint than squatting to 70 degrees. These findings may have implications with respect to the safe design of athletic training regimens and rehabilitation programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00017-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The impact of stance width on the sagittal plane is conflicting.

    “In terms of the sagittal plane, however, the impact of stance width is conflicting.25–27”
  • The hip flexion moment during wide stance squatting has been reported to be higher (10%-48%) or not different compared to narrow/medium stance squatting.

    “Similarly, the hip flexion moment during wide stance squatting has been reported to be higher (10%-48%)26,27 or not different compared to narrow/medium stance squatting.25”
  • Compared to a narrow/medium stance, the knee flexion moment during wide stance squatting has been reported to be higher (69%-80%), lower (11%), or not different.

    “Compared to a narrow/medium stance, the knee flexion moment during wide stance squatting has been reported to be higher (69%-80%),27 lower (11%),25 or not different.26”
  • Increased gluteus maximus activation can be achieved through the use of wider stance squats, as well as external band resistance around the thighs.

    “Increased gluteus maximus activation can be achieved through the use of wider stance squats,26–29 as well as external band resistance around the thighs.45,46”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 85

Authors
Salem, G. J., & Powers, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Salem, George J.
Venue
Clinical Biomechanics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-06
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
424-430
ISSN
0268-0033 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059383600
Cited by
85
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
patellofemoral joint, squatting, squat depth, knee extensor moment, patellofemoral joint stress, knee kinematics, ground reaction force, female athletes, resistance training, knee flexion
MeSH terms
Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Humans, Knee Joint, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review