Strategies of heavy metal uptake by three plant species growing near a metal smelter
Abstract
Some higher plant species have developed heavy metal tolerance strategies which enable them to survive and reproduce in highly metal-contaminated soils. We have investigated such heavy metal uptake and accumulation strategies of two absolute metallophyte species (Armeria maritima ssp. halleri and Cardaminopsis halleri) and one pseudometallophyte (Agrostis tenuis) growing near a former metal smelter. Samples of plant parts and soil were analysed for Zn, Cd, Pb, and Cu. In soil, there were two dominant types of metal concentration gradients with depth. Under the absolute metallophytes, extremely high metal contents were measured in the surficial Ah horizon, followed by a strong decrease in the underlying soil horizons (L(11) and L(12)). Under the pseudometallophyte, metal concentrations in the Ah horizon were much lower and fewer differences were observed in metal concentrations among the Ah, L(11), and L(12) horizons. The concentrations of Zn, Cd, Pb, and Cu in Agrostis tenuis roots were greater than concentrations in leaves, indicating significant metal immobilisation by the roots. For C. halleri, Zn and Cd concentrations in leaves were >20,000 and >100 mg kg(-1), respectively, indicating hyperaccumulation of these elements. Armeria maritima ssp. halleri exhibited root concentrations of Pb and Cu that were 20 and 88 times greater, respectively, than those in green leaves, suggesting an exclusion strategy by metal immobilisation in roots. However, Zn, Cd, Pb, and Cu concentrations in brown leaves of Armeria maritima ssp. halleri were 3-8 times greater than in green leaves, suggesting a second strategy, i.e. detoxification mechanism by leaf fall.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A. maritima subsp. halleri accumulated 88- and 20-times Cu and Pd in roots, respectively, compared to leaves.
“For example, in a comparative study, it was observed that A. maritima subsp. halleri accumulated 88- and 20-times Cu and Pd in roots, respectively, compared to leaves.”
From Plant hyperaccumulators: a state-of-the-art review on mechanism of heavy metal transport and sequestration (2025) · cites this paper as Dahmani-Muller et al., 2000
Pb, Cd, Zn, and Cu were found 3 to 8 times more in brown leaves than green leaves of A. maritima subsp. halleri.
“In addition, experiments also reveal that Pb, Cd, Zn, and Cu were found 3 to 8 times more in brown leaves than green leaves of A. maritima subsp. halleri (Dahmani-Muller et al., 2000).”
From Plant hyperaccumulators: a state-of-the-art review on mechanism of heavy metal transport and sequestration (2025) · cites this paper as Dahmani-Muller et al., 2000
In A. halleri, differential accumulation of Zn (>20,000 mg kg-1) and Cd (>100 mg kg-1) was observed in leaves rather than in other aerial tissues.
“In A. halleri, differential accumulation of Zn (>20,000 mg kg-1) and Cd (>100 mg kg-1) was observed in leaves rather than in other aerial tissues (Dahmani-Muller et al., 2000).”
From Plant hyperaccumulators: a state-of-the-art review on mechanism of heavy metal transport and sequestration (2025) · cites this paper as Dahmani-Muller et al., 2000
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 493
- Authors
- Dahmani-Muller, H., van Oort, F., Gélie, B., & Balabane, M.
- Affiliations
- Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
- Venue
- Environmental Pollution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 231-238
- ISSN
- 0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018257811
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 14.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
- Keywords
- heavy metal uptake, metallophytes, metal hyperaccumulation, Agrostis capillaris, metal exclusion, zinc, cadmium, lead, copper, metal-contaminated soil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review