Contribution of coffee, and tea to anemia among NHANES II participants
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the USA, coffee and tea drinking could not be found to contribute significantly to the 5.3% anaemia diagnosed in >11,000 participants of NHANES II.
“In the USA, coffee and tea drinking could not be found to contribute significantly to the 5⋅3 % anaemia that was diagnosed in the Ͼ11 000 participants of the Second National Health and Nutrition Education Survey (NHANES II) (Mehta et al. 1992).”
From Inhibition of non-haem iron absorption in man by polyphenolic-containing beverages (1999) · cites this paper as Mehta et al. 1992
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inhibition of non-haem iron absorption in man by polyphenolic-containing beverages
Hurrell, R. F., Reddy, M., & Cook, J. D. (1999) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114599000537 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mehta, S. W., Pritchard, M. E., & Stegman, C.
- Affiliations
- Northern Illinois University (US)
- ORCID
- Pritchard, Mary E
- Venue
- Nutrition Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-222
- ISSN
- 0271-5317 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075311372
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nutrition Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- anemia, coffee consumption, tea consumption, dietary iron, vitamin C, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, socioeconomic factors, NHANES II
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review