Cited by 27Coffee research and impactsIron Metabolism and DisordersNutritional Studies and Diet

Contribution of coffee, and tea to anemia among NHANES II participants

Mehta, Sudha W, Pritchard, Mary E, Stegman, Charles·1992·Nutrition Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0271-5317(05)80727-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the USA, coffee and tea drinking could not be found to contribute significantly to the 5.3% anaemia diagnosed in >11,000 participants of NHANES II.

    “In the USA, coffee and tea drinking could not be found to contribute significantly to the 5⋅3 % anaemia that was diagnosed in the Ͼ11 000 participants of the Second National Health and Nutrition Education Survey (NHANES II) (Mehta et al. 1992).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehta, S. W., Pritchard, M. E., & Stegman, C.
Affiliations
Northern Illinois University (US)
Venue
Nutrition Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-02
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
209-222
ISSN
0271-5317 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075311372
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nutrition Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
anemia, coffee consumption, tea consumption, dietary iron, vitamin C, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, socioeconomic factors, NHANES II

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review