Cited by 18Diet, Metabolism, and DiseaseFood composition and propertiesDiabetes Management and Research

Effect of volume and type of beverage consumed with a standard test meal on postprandial blood glucose responses

Young, Karen WH, Wolever, Thomas MS·1998·Nutrition Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0271-5317(98)00155-9

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have observed or indicated a relationship between the volume of water or food and postprandial responses, including incremental areas.

    “whereas others observed or indicate a relationship between the volume of water or food and postprandial responses, and sometimes incremental areas (Torsdottir & Anderson, 1989;Young & Wolever, 1998;Sievenpiper et al. 2001).”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Young & Wolever, 1998

  • Neither tea nor coffee significantly affects the incremental area under the glycaemic response curve.

    “Young & Wolever (1998) showed that neither tea nor coffee significantly affect the incremental area under the glycaemic response curve”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Young & Wolever (1998)

  • Tea and coffee influence the pattern of the blood glucose response.

    “however, as volume, they influence the pattern of blood glucose response.”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Young & Wolever (1998)

  • Studies that have examined how volume affects glycaemic response have produced contradictory results.

    “Unfortunately, the results of studies undertaken to date to evaluate the effect of volume on glycaemic response are contradictory.”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Young & Wolever, 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, K. W., & Wolever, T. M.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Nutrition Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-11
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
1857-1863
ISSN
0271-5317 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109266792
Cited by
18
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nutrition Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
postprandial blood glucose, water intake, coffee, tea, test meal, meal composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review